Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Texasforever
The problem is that the 4473's aren't evidence unless the suspect is detected by other methods back to the gun.

The gunstore owner is not to reveal the information on the 4473 unless the ATF has evidence to suggest that the owner could have commited a crime.

In this case all gunowners of this specific caliber are being treated as criminals.

It's happening Tex, it's just not being reported in the press.

2,632 posted on 10/20/2002 12:27:47 AM PDT by nunya bidness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2616 | View Replies ]


To: nunya bidness
In this case all gunowners of this specific caliber are being treated as criminals.

Wait a minute. How many owners have been contacted? How many have been forced to submit to ballistic testing?

2,634 posted on 10/20/2002 12:30:42 AM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2632 | View Replies ]

To: nunya bidness
In this case all gunowners of this specific caliber are being treated as criminals.

The same could be said of all the owners of "white box vans" no?

2,642 posted on 10/20/2002 12:33:21 AM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2632 | View Replies ]

To: nunya bidness
"In this case all gunowners of this specific caliber are being treated as criminals.

It's happening Tex, it's just not being reported in the press.

I was contacted by phone from someone claiming to be from the FBI about 2 weapons I own. Iw as asked if I still owned them and could I account for my where-abouts. I said I did still own them and and yes I could account for my where-abouts. I questioned him about how he obtained my info and that I thought Maryland didn't keep records like that. He said that he got the info from the original hard copy of the disclosure form I filled at the Gun dealer. I'm guessing he meant the 4473 that has the 7 questions on it that require a (YES) in order to walk out with the gun.

I didn't feel like I was treated like a criminal, but I have to question how he was able to get this info legally. The LEO on the phone did not say a thing about surrendering my gun for ballistic finger-printing, he just asked if I was willing to be interviewed if asked. I said no problem and he said thank You and hung up. An insurance adjuster I know was also contacted and was simularry questioned.

2,662 posted on 10/20/2002 12:44:10 AM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2632 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson