Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Envoy Warns N. Korea on Nukes
Yahoo - US News and World Report ^ | Sat, Oct 19, 2002 | SANG-HUN CHOE, Associated Press Writer

Posted on 10/19/2002 12:23:29 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

SEOUL, South Korea (AP) - A U.S. envoy on Saturday urged North Korea (news - web sites) to dismantle its nuclear weapons program, warning there will be no easy way out for the recalcitrant communist regime.

Photo
AP Photo

Assistant Secretary of State James Kelly, speaking after meetings with Chinese and South Korean officials, said Washington will lead a global campaign to bring "maximum international pressure on North Korea to abandon its nuclear weapons ambition."

South Korean Unification Minister Jeong Se-hyun was visiting Pyongyang, where he said he would urge North Korea to realize the international furor over its clandestine nuclear program.

"It is of paramount importance (for the North) to wisely resolve the concern recently raised," Jeong said in a speech during a dinner hosted by North Korean Prime Minister Hong Song Nam, according to pool reports from Pyongyang. Official talks begin Sunday.

On Wednesday, Washington said North Korea admitted having a nuclear weapons program in violation of a 1994 agreement the two countries signed in Geneva. The admission came at Oct. 3-5 talks in Pyongyang, when Kelly confronted his North Korean counterparts with evidence of a program to enrich uranium for nuclear weapons.

Both Koreas had agreed earlier to use the latest round of Cabinet-level talks to promote reconciliation on the divided Korean peninsula. Now Jeong says his most urgent task will be to gauge whether the North wants dialogue or confrontation.

Kelly said the Bush administration will not follow the diplomatic course that produced the 1994 agreement. Under that accord, North Korea pledged to dismantle its nuclear weapons program in return for construction of two light-water reactors. As part of the deal, the United States also provides North Korea with 500,000 tons of heating oil annually.

Critics have often said the 1994 deal coddled the Stalinist regime — a perception strengthened by the revelation that North Korea has been flouting that accord for years.

"This is not a replay of 1993 and 1994," Kelly said at a news conference after meeting South Korean Foreign Minister Choi Sung-hong.

Kelly flew to South Korea (news - web sites) early Saturday from Beijing, where he and U.S. Undersecretary of State John Bolton met Chinese officials, who Kelly said "made it very clear that they strongly oppose any nuclear weapons on the Korean Peninsula."

On Sunday, Kelly planned to travel to Japan to continue consultations with regional powers.

Kelly said that the isolated, impoverished North's best way to resume dialogue with Washington to improve ties and win badly needed aid was first to give up its newly revealed nuclear program.

He said the new revelation made it impossible for Washington to engage the North with dialogue.

Kelly said no deadline or timetable had been set in the campaign to pressure North Korea to abandon its covert nuclear program, as the United States is focused now on consultations with allies.

In Japan, Chief Cabinet Secretary Yasuo Fukuda and Kelly will discuss temporarily stopping construction of light-water nuclear reactors in North Korea, Japan's largest daily, the Yomiuri, reported Saturday, citing unidentified government sources.

When asked whether he discussed scrapping the 1994 deal with South Korean officials, Kelly said: "No decisions have been made on any next steps."

South Korea says dialogue is the best way to deal with concerns about North Korea. News of North Korea's nuclear program threw the South's so-called "sunshine" policy of engagement into disarray.

South Korea and Japan, the chief U.S. allies in Northeast Asia, are most vulnerable to North Korea's arsenal of missiles, chemical and biological weapons and now, possibly, nuclear bombs.




TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bushdoctrineunfold; northkorea; nukes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; First_Salute
Are we going to feel some pain in our everyday life from the requirement for resources?

As one who advocated gasoline rationing beginning Sept. 12, 2001, that's a damn good question.

People (liberals excepted) know that there is no free lunch. The war on terroism will be paid for, the only question is how.

I stand by my year-old answer: Inflation, the choice of politicians everywhere. Yeah, I know, that looks absurd right now, but just wait.

21 posted on 10/19/2002 3:34:14 PM PDT by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: chiefraincloud
What is our foreign policy? Bomb the weak, negociate with the strong and go into denial about Islam?

Sounds like a plan. Perhaps someone has a better plan?

22 posted on 10/19/2002 5:24:34 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
Bush ought to be laying off federal workers in some direct proportion to layoffs in private industry.

But he won't.

And we'll get to see your prediction some true by about a year from now.

23 posted on 10/19/2002 5:51:44 PM PDT by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
We could start the rationing with a cutoff of the 500,000 tons of fuel oil we pledged the N Koreans:

Two weeks ago, Mr. Bush decided not to certify Pyongyang's compliance with the framework — in a first for a U.S. president — but still ship 500,000 tons of fuel oil, as required by the accord.

Washington Times 4/4/02

24 posted on 10/19/2002 8:04:09 PM PDT by secretagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: secretagent
Amazing...
25 posted on 10/20/2002 3:45:02 AM PDT by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
The United States has replaced the Soviet Union as a primary benefactor of North Korea. The United States now feeds more than one-third of all North Koreans, and the U.S.-supported KEDO program supplies almost half of its HFO needs. This aid frees other resources for North Korea to divert to its WMD and conventional military programs.

North Korea Advisory Group Report to The Speaker U.S. House of Representatives November 1999

Don't know about these days, though.

26 posted on 10/20/2002 9:55:33 AM PDT by secretagent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: secretagent; First_Salute
Double flipping amazing. Thanks for the links (I think).
27 posted on 10/20/2002 10:47:00 AM PDT by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

Comment #28 Removed by Moderator

To: chiefraincloud; snopercod
Bump.
29 posted on 10/20/2002 8:50:41 PM PDT by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: chiefraincloud
Sorry for the welcome and my free expression. It won't happen again.
30 posted on 10/21/2002 10:06:31 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Yup. Far too many. In my opinion the Axis of Evil strategy is a mistake. The proper response was to limit the war to locales with proven al Qaeda presence, such as Afghanistan, Sudan and the Philippines; and avoid like a plague a war on Arab regimes simply because we don't like them. Now the War on Terror has completely lost focus.
31 posted on 10/21/2002 1:54:50 PM PDT by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: annalex
Now the War on Terror has completely lost focus.

Yup, exactly as I warned you, and it may get a LOT worse. If, in the middle of this, China allies with Russian gangs to pop open our prisons, cuts loose a bioterror attack, blows the Panama Canal, abets an attack from Mexico, and hits some major infrastructure (such as gas pipelines or electrical power sources to pump water), we're in big trouble.

Without power we cannot refrigerate. Without pumps we cannot grow food. Our entire agricultural apparatus is in danger of shutdown due to environmental regulation. Where will an urban population get its food and water? Where will they run? Who will take care of them? How would such services be located near population centers?

Guess where the structural solutions lie?

32 posted on 10/21/2002 2:10:07 PM PDT by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
If you are implying that the structural solutions are in civil defense, then that is not sufficient. Look how they cannot catch a single rifleman (well, maybe a few of them). We have to fight our wars, treat them seriously, and take them to the enemy's territory whenever possible, and not run away from the imperialist label. It doesn't mean we should fight every foreign war, or look for one when there isn't any.
33 posted on 10/21/2002 3:52:00 PM PDT by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: annalex
The type of civil defense I am talking about doesn't exist. It's a system by which to augment professional police and manage disasters that is totally private. It's in the book.
34 posted on 10/21/2002 3:55:16 PM PDT by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
My feeling is that, incredibly, what we are going to get from the sniper scare is more gun control. Our domestic policies are no longer rational.
35 posted on 10/22/2002 8:32:16 AM PDT by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson