You speak of constitutionality to defend the actions of the biggest mass murderers Europe has seen this generation - that's what it boils down to, and no amount of argument is going to vindicate you on this matter.
I'm talking about why the war was forced on the bosnian serbs, having in mind the events of World War II and the genocide commited against the serbs in this area and yes, I am talking about constitutional rights that were breached. Denying the right to self-determination to the Bosnian and Krajina Serbs,and at the same time consisting on those rights by the muslims for themselves, was and still is a historical crime having in consideration the events and the outcome of both World Wars. That's why the war was inevitable and I'm trying to explain why.
And it was an ugly war. Here we agree, I guess. But speaking of mass murder, how many dead did we have in this war? How many dead serbs, croats and bosnian muslims in particular?
How many Sarajevo serbs, were amongst the victims of the muslim staged 'Markale' massacre?
What came first, the breach of the bosnian constitution or the break out of the war? There is cause and effect in this scenario as well and you are trying to smear it. That's what I call, leading someone by the nose, and no amount of argument is going to vindicate you on this matter.