[betty boop]

...you clearly have too many issues with mainstream science and the preponderance of evidence since the mid-19th century....

Very astute observation, VR. Can you imagine why that might be the case?

As far as "mainstream science" goes, I'd feel a whole lot happier right now if I had reason to believe that "mainstream science" was still operating as "mainstream science."

Sorry for the apparent redundancy. Just taking liberties with common English usage to make the point.

[PatrickHenry]

As far as "mainstream science" goes, I'd feel a whole lot happier right now if I had reason to believe that "mainstream science" was still operating as "mainstream science."

If it's any comfort, BB, I agree that the so-called "social sciences" are virtually all hogwash. But I can't believe you have issues with astronomy, physics, chemistry, etc. (And, believe it or not, they're all consistent with evolution.)