[PatrickHenry]

To say the evolution issue has been dispositively "decided," therefore all further discussion is moot, is the complete antithesis of how Western science has proceeded in the past. Or so it seems to me.

BB, you are always in my dreams! It's nice that we agree on something, like the above sentence. Of course, no one in the biology field would ever make such a statement, so you can relax. No point getting worked up over a position that no one has ever taken.

[Phaedrus]

No point getting worked up over a position that no one has ever taken (i.e. that all further meaningful discussion is moot).

Ah, but Patrick, that is precisely the position of those such as yourself who oppose teaching the contradictory facts and the controversy in our public schools. Can it be explained why so-called Darwinist science closes its mind at some definitive point known only to the Evolutionists?

The broader answer is that only the inattentive, continuously bombarded by the Orwellian, Leftist Media, can remain "convinced" that Atheist, Anti-Christian Darwinism is science. People are beginning to "get it".

[tallhappy]

To say the evolution issue has been dispositively "decided," therefore all further discussion is moot, is the complete antithesis of how Western science has proceeded in the past. Or so it seems to me.

BB, you are always in my dreams! It's nice that we agree on something, like the above sentence. Of course, no one in the biology field would ever make such a statement, so you can relax. No point getting worked up over a position that no one has ever taken.

I guess you are saying, for only one example, that Richard Dawkins is not in the biology field.

Your silliness never ceases to amaze me.