[Phaedrus]

Now you made this foolish statement in your long earlier screed, in bold.

Evolution isn't about the origins of life.

So why, balrog, was the premier pro-evolution web site named "TalkOrigins"?

I will quietly await your answer and if you throw more childish insults, I will call them out. Waiting patiently, balrog, for your answer . . .

[Condorman]

It took some doing but after an exhaustive Internet search, I was able to find this description:

Talk.origins is a Usenet newsgroup [not a website--CM] devoted to the discussion and debate of biological and physical origins. Most discussions in the newsgroup center on the creation/evolution controversy, but other topics of discussion include the origin of life, geology, biology, catastrophism, cosmology and theology.

[balrog666]

Yes, I made this statement: Evolution isn't about the origins of life.

So? You see any biologists disagreeing? Abiogenesis is an interesing theory about the origins of life but it's not evolution. Why is that so difficult for you to figure out when you see it posted in every crevo thread (assuming you actually read any of them, of course)?

So why, balrog, was the premier pro-evolution web site named "TalkOrigins"?

Ask them if you want to know. I am sure that, if you ask politely, they will answer you. However, if you call them Atheist Anti-Christian Darwinists first, I suspect they might treat you accordingly.

I will quietly await your answer and if you throw more childish insults, I will call them out. Waiting patiently, balrog, for your answer . . .

Insults, me? Nah, couldn't be.