Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gerfang
If they were, there would be a lot more biologists running around.

There are rarely any biologists on these threads because there's so little actual content to the Creationist/ID argument on the science side. After "evolution is wrong", the science part of the discussion is over. Few biologists will waste their time trying to understand why someone thinks evolution is the work of the devil.

117 posted on 10/21/2002 6:50:39 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]


To: <1/1,000,000th%
There are rarely any biologists on these threads because there's so little actual content to the Creationist/ID argument on the science side.

It is the evolutionists who refuse to discuss science, not the opponents. All I see on these threads is claims by evolutionists that evolution is science but nothing to back it up. I do see from opponents an attempt to show that evolution is not science, but such attempts are ignored and shouted down by evolutionists. If you guys want to talk science, let's do so, let us know:

1. One example of a species which has been seen to transform itself into another more complex one.
2. One example of a mutation which added an entirely new function to a species.
3. One single Nobel Prize winning discovery which does not tend to disprove evolution.
4. One example of an evolutionary invention which has benefited mankind.
5. One single experiment which proves evolution.
6. One single example of a species saved from destruction by mutation.

Oh and I almost forgot, since paleontology is the basis of most of the evidence for evolution, kindly tell me:
1. What is the evidence that dinosaurs did not have purple skin? (this is needed because skin is almost an absolute requirement for proper classification - fish have scales, reptiles do not, mammals have fur, and birds have feathers).
2. What is the evidence that dinosaurs did not have mammary glands? (again this is absolutely necessary since the definition of a mammal is that it has mammary glands).
3. What is the evidence that dinosaurs had 2, 3, or 4 chambered hearts? (again this is necessary because different species have different hearts)
4. What is the evidence for dinosaur DNA? (again, this is necessary to tell us the relationships to different species).

Seems you have a full plate above IF you want to back up your claim that evolution is science and that evolutionists want to talk about science.

120 posted on 10/21/2002 7:15:49 PM PDT by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson