Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Catspaw
I understand the need for the call to be recorded, but I don't know if this is the proper use of 911. That number is to be used for emergency calls only. Tying up that line to verify an ID doesn't seem to be an emergency.

Reporting someone who is (possibly) impersonating a police officer or faderal agent surely is an emergency.

19 posted on 10/18/2002 5:49:36 AM PDT by Chemist_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Chemist_Geek
Federal, that is... Need more coffee...
20 posted on 10/18/2002 5:52:00 AM PDT by Chemist_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Chemist_Geek
I beg to differ. Law enforcement agencies have non-emergency numbers, and that's the number to call. The reason stated for calling 911 is to have the call taped, not because it's an emergency. If one wants the call taped, one can tape. In Maryland, one has to have the consent of the other person to tape the call and that can be achieved by informing the law enforcement agency that one wants to tape the call. If they don't consent to taping the call, then a call to 911 may be appropriate, but not before.
22 posted on 10/18/2002 5:59:42 AM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Chemist_Geek
"Reporting someone who is (possibly) impersonating a police officer or faderal agent surely is an emergency."

No it isn't. An emergency involves a direct, immediate threat to life or property.

Call the local PD's non-emergency line.
66 posted on 10/18/2002 10:59:29 AM PDT by BiffSchneider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson