To: nicmarlo
Since there have been conspiracy theories posted, I thought I'd get mine in, as farfetched as it may be.
What if the "sniper" is some nut who wanted to kill one specific person, but knew that he would be an immediate suspect if that person were murdered? Now, his victim is just one of many and the police are not looking for motives for each inividual killing.
I said some nut.
To: kattracks
The shootings seem to have stopped after they killed Linda Franklin, the FBI intelligence analyst. We know the FBI has been analyzing information about money transfers to the terrorists in this country.
To: kattracks
That's a possibility (as are all ideas, right now, until we can disprove any idea). But, if that were so, it seems the person would only kill a couple more than the intended one, not as many. I would also think he'd have stopped that first day, when he killed, what was it, 4 or 5? That was "good enough" I would think. No?
18 posted on
10/18/2002 4:32:50 AM PDT by
nicmarlo
To: kattracks
Anyone stupid enough to deliberately multiply the risks against getting away with it would not have the brains to do this. Just getting away with 1 murder is hard how much harder would 11 be.
This is more crap from the "experts" floundering about trying to avoid calling this terrorism.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson