[thedugal]

Holy smokes!!!! 2 in 1 thread! Did I truly need to put a [sarcasm] after that post????? I am honestly in shock, are you guys both related to Forest Gump? Nutters.

Now, for the record. IT WAS A JOKE!!!!!! I WAS POINTING OUT THE ABSURDITY OF THE MEDIA BY BEING ABSURD.

[ko_kyi]

fa·ce·tious Pronunciation Key (f-sshs)
adj.
Playfully jocular; humorous: facetious remarks.

---

[French facétieux, from facétie, jest, from Latin factia, from factus, witty.]

---

fa·cetious·ly adv.
fa·cetious·ness n.

[Do Be]

Holy smokes!!!! 2 in 1 thread! Did I truly need to put a [sarcasm] after that post????? I am honestly in shock, are you guys both related to Forest Gump? Nutters. Now, for the record. IT WAS A JOKE!!!!!! I WAS POINTING OUT THE ABSURDITY OF THE MEDIA BY BEING ABSURD.

Sorry to put you in shock, but as you say, you were saying absurd things and trying to be absurd and I felt it my duty to congratulate you on your success.

[packrat01]

you ought really close your sarcasm tags. some people believe what you wrote, to be the truth. I had to wonder, until you replied the second time. IneStine.

[Woahhs]

Um, excuse me! Before you go throwing stones at those that don't get your "jokes," perhaps you would do well to consider your name, theDUgal.

[ohioman]

I haven't seen you post before, therefore, I had no idea. I feel much better now as you seem to be the basic freedom-loving Freeper.

[katana]

Your comments would fit right in on the editorial pages of the New York Times, Washington Post, or countless other papers. Absurd as they were, it's not so surprising people took them at face value. We have all seen much worse.

That being said, compliments on your perfect parody of the standard liberal line.

[ravingnutter]

Hey, watch who you're calling a Nutter, I have standards to maintain! : )

[TigersEye]

Holy smokes!!!! 2 in 1 thread! Did I truly need to put a [sarcasm] after that post????? I am honestly in shock, are you guys both related to Forest Gump? Nutters.

Oh. Yeah, I see. Since there was nothing in your post that goes any further at all than what the anti-gun nuts are saying, no, it was not obvious that you were being sarcastic. I can't see the expression on your face, I can't hear the tone of your voice and crap like that is posted as a serious statement here on FR from time to time. You're not in shock you're just in awe of yourself.

[Mad_Tom_Rackham]

Holy smokes!!!! 2 in 1 thread! Did I truly need to put a [sarcasm] after that post?????

Sigh. Looks like some have not had enough coffe yet this morning.

PS: Does that insfferable idiot buffoon Chung (of the extreme loser cable network MSNBC) not realize that beautiful, innocent children were indeed MURDERED on 9-11!!!

A mind is a terrible thing to waste.

[Frapster]

i'm an idiot - I thought you were serious in your post. I was looking forward to the eventual 'post deleted' followed by 'banned' comments. lol