Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Revenge served cold - Florida Supreme MUST GO on Nov.5 (From Campaign2002 Thread) IMPORTANT
The Associated Press ^

Posted on 10/17/2002 6:45:58 PM PDT by jmstein7

Revenge served cold - Florida Supreme MUST GO on Nov.5 Topeka Capital Journal / Associated Press ^ | 12/14/2000 | Associated Press

Posted on 10/17/2002 10:02 AM Pacific by SES1066

Florida justice Anstead scrutinized The Associated Press 12/14/2000 [A Past Due Reminder]

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. -- Florida voters have never removed a justice from the state Supreme Court. But Florida justices have never before played such a central role in a close presidential race.

In the aftermath of the historic, five-week legal struggle, conservatives long critical of liberal "judicial activism" have a new target: Justice Harry Lee Anstead, who faces voters in two years.

"The spotlight will be on him, I can guarantee it, no doubt about it," said Republican John Thrasher, a former state House speaker.

Anstead, a Democrat, was one of four justices who voted last week to give Vice President Al Gore the hand counts he sought in his election contest. The U.S. Supreme Court's fractured ruling overturning that decision Tuesday ended the race and gave the White House to George W. Bush.

The three justices who voted with him won't face voters for six years, leaving Anstead the possible lone target for the state's Republican-controlled Legislature, which has been vocal in its disapproval of the decision. Already, a citizens group has formed to call for Anstead's ouster.

"Passions are high," said Patrick Riordan, a history professor at the University of South Florida. "I don't think people are going to forget in two years."

Ken Connor, who failed in an effort to turn out two justices after a 1989 ruling overturned a parental-consent abortion law, isn't so sure.

"That's an eternity in politics," said Connor, now president of the Family Research Council.

Chief Justice Charles Wells is also on the ballot in 2002. All seven justices were appointed by Democratic governors, but Wells seems on surer footing after siding with the minority Friday, writing a passionate dissent immediately quoted by Bush supporters.

Also in the minority were Major B. Harding, who faces voters in 2004, and Leander J. Shaw, set to retire in 2003.

Thrasher won't speculate about Anstead's fate but predicted interest in how Florida's appellate judges get and keep their jobs will stay high -- so high it might be changed.

The seven justices on the Supreme Court and the judges on Florida's five District Courts of Appeal are all appointed by the governor. Every six years the justices and appeals judges face voters in a "merit-retention" election.

Critics may push to change the constitution to have appellate judges elected instead of appointed, Thrasher said.

On Nov. 7, the three justices who joined Anstead in Friday's ruling -- Barbara Pariente, R. Fred Lewis and Peggy Quince -- sailed through their merit-retention elections with nearly three-quarters of the vote.

Susan Johnson, a Winter Park Republican, voted for Bush and to retain the three justices. She said she got down to their names on the ballot and thought to herself, "I'm sure these guys are fine."

Johnson said Wednesday she knows now how wrong she was.

"This is an extremely liberal court. This is an extremely partisan court. This is an activist bench," she said.

This week, Johnson formed an organization called Balance to the Bench with Tampa businessman Sam Rashid. The group wants to increase voters' awareness of judges' records -- and remove Anstead.

"It seems out of balance to me that we have a conservative Legislature, a conservative governor and a conservative Cabinet but an extremely liberal court," Johnson said.

Anstead, 63, was appointed to the Florida Supreme Court in 1994 by then-Gov. Lawton Chiles. He faced voters two years later and breezed through with 68.5 percent of the vote.

But in 2002, Florida voters could be as divided over Anstead as they were over this year's presidential race.

"There will be those who will not want to forget about the activity of the court and the feeling that they overreached and, conversely, there will be those who feel they did the right thing," Thrasher said.

Former Chief Justice Gerald Kogan said he isn't convinced Anstead's job is at risk, calling him "one of the finest justices we've ever had."

"There may very well be a lot more Gore voters in Florida than Bush voters, so it's not like he's universally condemned for this," Kogan said. "As a matter of fact, half the voters in Florida are very happy with him -- and that's more than most justices can say."


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections; US: Florida; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: 2000election; anstead; florida; meritretention; supremecourt; wells
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: jmstein7
GO FLORIDA FREEPERS!!

This is a GREAT idea!!!
41 posted on 10/18/2002 2:05:12 PM PDT by FreeTheHostages
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
I voted absentee. Hope others remember and vote accordingly.
42 posted on 10/18/2002 2:12:14 PM PDT by bluewater bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
I said "I recognize it's an imperfect system," but that doesn't mean it flat-out "does not work." In Florida, because the elections are "nonpartisan," it's very difficult to find out how the person was registered. Papers won't publish it (Heavens! that would violate the magical "nonpartisan" nature of the election!) Certainly, if they did, I agree, that would be a better indicator.

As for do I want a prosecutor making determinations involving child support, etc.? Sure, I don't think being a prosecutor disqualifies them from being good at civil cases. The reality is that usually someone from one side of the system is appointed or the other. Civil lawyers get appointed and have to learn the criminal system, and vice versa.

Now, I'd be happy to debate whether that's a GOOD system. Doesn't Texas have separate criminal courts? I think that's a good idea. In Florida, most newbies get put in juvenile court -- where the law is actually quite convoluted and difficult. Very few of them are equipped to handle it, frequently their decisions reflect that ignorance, and it's usually poor little kids that pay the price.
43 posted on 10/18/2002 2:26:49 PM PDT by Amore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Boatlawyer
http://www.founding.org/columns/html/fljustices.html ...rto
44 posted on 10/18/2002 3:42:40 PM PDT by visitor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: caltrop
Please. The rumors of McBride winning are sheer newspaper hype.
45 posted on 10/18/2002 7:45:03 PM PDT by =Intervention=
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

We need to do something. What are the laws for posting signs and such near voting places? How about bumper stickers? We've got to raise public awareness somehow and get these judges OFF the bench now!
46 posted on 10/18/2002 7:50:06 PM PDT by =Intervention=
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: =Intervention=
Dump the democrat pocket toys on the SCOFLA and appoint Judge Sauls!
47 posted on 10/18/2002 7:52:36 PM PDT by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
My vote against them is guarenteed. I'm printing up bumper stickers and working on signs right now! Gonna post the signs up and down US-1!!
48 posted on 10/21/2002 6:24:50 PM PDT by =Intervention=
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7
From the Ft. Lauderdale Sun-Sentinal, October 15, 2002:

Vote yes to retain appeals court, Supreme Court judges

South Florida Sun-Sentinel Editorial Board

Posted October 15 2002

On Nov. 5, voters will face six "merit retention" referendum questions, asking if they want to retain in office two Florida Supreme Court justices and four judges from the 4th District Court of Appeal.

The South Florida Sun-Sentinel Editorial Board recommends a "yes" vote on each.

These officials are on the ballot only because the Florida Constitution requires them to survive a "merit retention" vote every six years to stay in office.

No one has ever been ousted in any of these elections, which began in 1978 for appellate court judges and in 1980 for Supreme Court justices. These officials were first appointed by a governor, not elected. No candidates can run against them, and there is no organized opposition to their retention.

All those facing merit retention are experienced jurists and legal scholars. All are supported for retention and rated highly by members of the Florida Bar who know them for quality and clarity of judicial opinions, knowledge of the law, integrity, judicial temperament, impartiality, and judicial demeanor.

All have a solid record of achievement in the law and deserve to be kept in office.

-PJ
49 posted on 10/21/2002 6:33:35 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amore
Voters won't vote out the judges. It's a divisive topic and one that Jeb can't win.

The left owns the most soapboxes. During election 2000 (and on and on...), the DNC version of events is the only one most Florida voters heard. When more people turn off perky Katie, and local Floridians once again own the "hometown" papers...we'll get there. Our local SOE said that in the 20 years voters have been able to elect judges, not one judge has been voted out of office. Judge=wise man to most Americans.

We'll see how many Floridians vote with their eyes open this election.

50 posted on 10/22/2002 6:46:37 AM PDT by Ragtime Cowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: =Intervention=
BUMPER STICKERS!!!! Come one, come all! Anti-SCOFLAW bumper stickers! I'll post a pic in a moment. If you want one, let me know!!! It's raining right now, so it's a good thing I didn't get the signs up on US-1...
51 posted on 10/24/2002 5:38:00 PM PDT by =Intervention=
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: =Intervention=
Here ya go...the main graphic is about the size of your palm.


52 posted on 10/24/2002 5:49:18 PM PDT by =Intervention=
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson