Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Witness may have given fake story about shooter, van, weapon
Associated Press

Posted on 10/17/2002 12:52:05 PM PDT by RCW2001

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: Alberta's Child
Moose said the witness' emphatic description of the shooter's AK-74 is also bogus.

IIRC, the witness who saw the shooters clearly, as they backed out their van, was not the witness who saw and recognized the gun.

How much of this is politics? Pressure from elected officials whose pro-gun-control stance would appear absurd, if this turns out to be a Saudi with a smuggled rifle?

61 posted on 10/17/2002 2:41:46 PM PDT by jdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: texasbluebell
he didn't seem serious at all, and was grinning strangely, too much for seeing a brutal crime like that

I've met several Iranians, and they seem to have the "not serious" "grinning strangely" aspect to them. Could be genetic.

62 posted on 10/17/2002 2:42:28 PM PDT by ARCADIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
Nothing at all stopping them from calling up every FFL in the country and ordering them to turn over records of every .223 weapon they've sold

Actually there are a couple of things. One the shear magnitude of the effort, and the fact that while. as you say. the FFLs are required to maintiain the records, the feds are prohibited from doing so themselves. They can legally trace individual guns, but "forward" tracing is (supposed to be) illegal. I'm pretty sure that the FFLs are not required to turn over their records anytime the BATF asks for them, but are required to provide information on specific weapons in the course of a criminal investigation. Having the records exist at all is dangerous, but not nearly as dangerous as having them all in a BATF computer in the District of Criminals.

63 posted on 10/17/2002 2:43:30 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: valleygal
But I'm wondering if the person they discredited is the one thst said he saw the shooter step out of the van, take the shot, get back in and drive away.

That's who I think it is, too. That would be the chief witness. BTW, that never sounded like our shooter.

64 posted on 10/17/2002 2:45:03 PM PDT by ARCADIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: cryptical
If a FBI agent wants to question me, they can talk to my lawyer.

Seeing that the FBI has "nada" and they are just going through a list of 1000s of gun owners trying to find a clue. I would help them cross me off their list. I would volunteer to go in. And bring my alibis with me. That way they don't waste time with me or my lawyer and continue working the list.

65 posted on 10/17/2002 2:48:04 PM PDT by ARCADIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
I'm pretty sure that the FFLs are not required to turn over their records anytime the BATF asks for them, but are required to provide information on specific weapons in the course of a criminal investigation.

How many FFLs would really dare to refuse a request from the BATF? They know the BATF can put them out of business in a heartbeat.

Having the records exist at all is dangerous, but not nearly as dangerous as having them all in a BATF computer in the District of Criminals

How much has this difference slowed them down in the case at hand?

66 posted on 10/17/2002 2:55:10 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Witness may have given fake story about shooter, van, weapon

Eye-witness testimony in doubt? Really?

Since when has eye-witness testimony ever been 100% (TWA800, OKC bombing and JD#2 'sightings' ...)

67 posted on 10/17/2002 2:58:58 PM PDT by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Britton J Wingfield
My BS meter just pegged.
68 posted on 10/17/2002 3:00:18 PM PDT by sparkomatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cryptical; All
MSNBC saying that the witness may have intentionally misled the cops...
69 posted on 10/17/2002 3:00:33 PM PDT by Bella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
Oh yes, TWA800 witnesses were not credible.

Have you ever seen the 'spread' of what witnesses claim to have seen regarding AA FLT 587?

"Those accounts were all over the ball park ..."

The CREDIBLE ACCOUNTS on TWA 800 were from those pilots who were IN THE AIR at the time, and in particular, one crew who was BEHIND TWA 800 - and they did NOT report seeing 'a missile' ...

70 posted on 10/17/2002 3:04:21 PM PDT by _Jim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EverOnward
"Message to all white guys driving white vans: better have an airtight alibi because the authorities are looking for YOU."

Actually, I know a guy whose driving a white van to DC this weekend. I offered to loan him some "Guns and Ammo" magazines to read on the trip. I'm such a nice guy.
71 posted on 10/17/2002 3:13:45 PM PDT by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: FreeTally
does when they pry them from my cold dead fingers ring a bell
72 posted on 10/17/2002 3:14:34 PM PDT by riverrunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Eyewitness testimony is UNRELIABLE. Till they catch the individual or vehicle on a CAMERA, nothing should be discounted. Is this witness a Freeper? Sounds like a part of the FR tinfoil brigade. The terrorists have won. We might as well all turn Socialist. It's embarrassing how the tinfoil contingent behaves.
73 posted on 10/17/2002 3:35:22 PM PDT by VRWC For Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
This is odd. Are they saying that the guy misled the investigators on purpose, as if he was helping the sniper?

Whether he intended to or not, that would be the effect of what he did. The police had roadblocks looking for the cream-colored van and likely the murderer just drove off in some other vehicle.

I wonder if the police know who he really is, or is he part of the plot and he give them a fake id. I haven't had the time to look at all the threads to see if that issue has been addressed.

I tend to think he is not part of the plot because cnn.com (I know, I know) is reporting that sources say he was in the store at the time of the shooting. If he was part of the plot, you would think he would pre-position himself in a location that would make him a more believable witness.

If his actions aided the escape in any way, I think he should be charged as an accessory after the fact to murder.

74 posted on 10/17/2002 3:38:54 PM PDT by ConservativeLawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: sparkomatic
I cannot vouch for the veracity of that post. Then again, I can't vouch for the calibration of your BS-meter ;)
75 posted on 10/17/2002 3:48:11 PM PDT by Britton J Wingfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
You could very well be right. Just wanting to be important..but then, may not!
76 posted on 10/17/2002 3:49:00 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeLawyer
"I wonder if the police know who he really is, or is he part of the plot and he give them a fake id. I haven't had the time to look at all the threads to see if that issue has been addressed.

...he was in the store at the time of the shooting. If he was part of the plot, you would think he would pre-position himself in a location that would make him a more believable witness."

True..and I bet the feds know by now what grades he had in jr high..

77 posted on 10/17/2002 3:51:48 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: valleygal
"The guy that was on Greta the other night is named Robert (I think) Massis.

Actually it was Raymond Masis and my spouse and I were trying to place the accent. We thought it was Eastern European.

78 posted on 10/17/2002 4:51:49 PM PDT by NilesJo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
The press released the witness's name in an earlier story. Either they were hoping for retaliation and had the witness 'protected' or the press was 'not thinking' and now they are trying to cover for the witness.
79 posted on 10/17/2002 6:39:16 PM PDT by Talldocs1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001

TONIGHT! 6pm PDT/9pm EDT Unspun With AnnaZ and Guest Hostess DIOTIMA!

ELECTIONS and OMISSIONS!

Plus, let's hear from FReepers around the country about what you're doing in YOUR local area with the midterm elections!

Call in! 1-868-RadioFR!

Click HERE for RadioFR Archives!

Click HERE for the RadioFR Chat Room!


80 posted on 10/17/2002 6:39:38 PM PDT by Bob J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson