Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Five-year old boy raped by 2 fifth grade boys, family sues Board of Ed
Cleveland Plain Dealer ^ | 10/17/02 | James F. McCarty

Posted on 10/17/2002 4:23:24 AM PDT by fone

(Link may expire)

One day after school, she later recalled, the boy came home with a broken belt. Another time, his underpants were on backward and soiled.

On April 21, the grandmother said, she overheard the boy ask his 8-year-old brother to "get the two fifth-graders that are hurting me." When she questioned the boy, he told a horrific story.

Over the previous month, two older classmates - one 10, the other 11 - repeatedly raped him in the school lavatory. They yanked down his pants and, as one boy held him, the other sodomized him, the little boy said.

The boy later told police that the two older boys raped him about 10 times. When he tried to tell a teacher about the attacks, she rebuffed him: "No tattle-tales," she said, according to the police report.

Yesterday, the boy and his mother filed a $2 million lawsuit against the Cleveland Board of Education, accusing school administrators of negligence for failing to provide security adequate to prevent the rapes.

"To think that this sort of thing could go on in a school is unbelievable," said Maple Heights attorney David Pomerantz, who represents the boy and his mother. "It's unconscionable that this happened to him, but it's equally unconscionable that a school would allow it to happen. Obviously, they should be supervising kids better in bathrooms."

Reports of the sexual attacks first came to light on April 22, when the boy's grandmother took him to Rainbow Babies & Children's Hospital and a doctor there called police.

Detectives from the police Sex Crimes Unit investigated, and the boy's accused attackers were charged with rape in Cuyahoga County Juvenile Court. They are awaiting trial.

Pomerantz said a case worker from Children and Family Services substantiated the boy's allegations. An agency spokesman, however, said there was no record of the case being investigated or reported.

Schools spokesman Dan Minnich said neither of the boys accused in the case currently attends Cleveland schools. One has been placed at the Berea Children's Home; Minnich didn't know the other's whereabouts. As soon as the allegations were raised, he said, the district launched an internal investigation with Cleveland police, and the boys were removed from Charles Dickens.

Ward 3 City Councilman Zachary Reed, who represents the Mount Pleasant neighborhood around the school, said the allegations are shocking, but shouldn't detract from the area's revitalization.

"Anything can happen in a big-league city," he said. "We need to ensure that nothing like this ever happens in a school here ever again."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: childrape; homeschoollist; notattletales; schoolabuse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-159 next last
To: Ready2go
Post # 83, deserves a thread of it's own.
121 posted on 10/17/2002 7:36:49 PM PDT by F.J. Mitchell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
MOUNT PLEASANT???? What an ironic name for this town.

Not on the that, the school's name is "Charles DICKENS" ( Dick-ins) !

122 posted on 10/17/2002 7:42:29 PM PDT by Wil H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: PleaseNoMore
I beg to differ with your liberalesque knee jerk reaction to proper punishment for two monsters who made the life of a boy half their age, pure living hell, in an institution that is supposed to be where children are safe and being molded into the future adults of this country-not twisted by junior demons into freaky misfits with sexual identity problems that can last a life time.

I don't care whether these creatures are tried as adults or as children and I don't believe they should be thrown into adult prision as entertainment for adult perverts of their on species. Once convicted, they should be turned over to the father of the five year old to do with as he damn well pleases-to emasculate or to slaughter as he sees fit. The man should not be forced to resist his urges to destroy his childs molesters-the law should understand his feelings and sanction his actions. Anything else is not justice, but abuse of the innocent.

We've just become to d*mn tolorant-that is our problem.
123 posted on 10/17/2002 8:07:30 PM PDT by F.J. Mitchell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Texas Mom
O........M.........G!!!!!
124 posted on 10/17/2002 8:17:32 PM PDT by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
And I hate to break it to you, but until you intervened, your son WAS headed for school with anticipation of sex in the boys room -- he made that pretty clear to you, I thought. The first grader he looked up to had told him that was one of things kids did at school, along with kickball at recess, and spitballs in class when the teacher has her back turned.

You're one sick puppy.

125 posted on 10/17/2002 10:04:45 PM PDT by Texas Mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: frodolives
I'm sorry to be so blunt, but being a 43 year old woman, I must ask- Is it really possible for a ten year old boy to get an erection?

Yep.

126 posted on 10/17/2002 10:08:50 PM PDT by dheretic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell
I personally would like to see the 8th amendment partially repealed. The only part that should remain is the fine/excess bail. The physical penalty should be unlimited. Imagine.... death penalty by incineration, exposure to acid and things like that!
127 posted on 10/17/2002 10:14:22 PM PDT by dheretic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: fone
I heard this story about 8 or 10 times on TV this morning. Each time a little different, once I heard the reporter say that the teacher is still with the school, but her name is not being released to protect her privacy...

Yeah, there's no reason to punish her. It's not as if she did anything really bad, such as teaching the kids what the word "niggardly" means. [ /sarcasm]

128 posted on 10/17/2002 10:35:37 PM PDT by Rainbow Rising
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: dheretic
I agree unconditionally. Imagine the deterrent value of death by attaching all four limbs and other appendages depending upon the crime, each to separate bull dozers that drives off as slowly as possible until the point of maximum tension is reached. Then the engines are shut down and everyone goes home for the night, leaving the executionee alone with his thoughts and surrounded by the useful idiots of the candlelight vigil persuasion. In the morning, maybe noonish, the engines are fired up and the sentence is finalized.

If that is not a deterrent, then no law abiding citizen should feel guilty about coming out and enjoying the show.



129 posted on 10/17/2002 10:46:58 PM PDT by F.J. Mitchell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: sockmonkey
In Texas? Lookingbill or Taylor?
130 posted on 10/17/2002 10:47:31 PM PDT by Psycho Francis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: fone
Check this out: Some parents received a letter (recently, one woman who has a girl in the class was reading from it) the teacher stated that the children IN CLASS that day witnessed an "inappropriate" sexual act (???) but they were "not to worry because" the children were given (I think this is verbatim) "an appropriate explanation, and the situation will be handled in an appropriate manner"

Thank you for the update.

What a house of horrors. God help these children.

And if I hear the word "inappropriate" one more time from another school employee or psychologist I'm going to scream.

131 posted on 10/18/2002 5:16:43 AM PDT by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: fone
But really, how long ago did this happen to you? 70's, 80's, 90's?

Early 70s in an upper middle class suburb in the Boston area with "great schools." The inmates ran the asylum.

132 posted on 10/18/2002 5:19:25 AM PDT by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell
No need to beg to differ with my opinion. It is your right to disagree.

I have not once said that these children should not be punished. Not once. Maybe the parents of these children should be held to some level of accountability as well.

If showing mercy to children ( and yes, these are children ) and wanting to see them get the help they obviously need makes me a liberal then God help the conservatives.

133 posted on 10/18/2002 5:32:35 AM PDT by PleaseNoMore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: fone
Gee, but the "gay activists" can't be held responsible for this. They aren't the ones telling 5th graders (and the rest of the world) about what they like to do with each other (and small boys)!

MARK A SITY
134 posted on 10/18/2002 5:37:39 AM PDT by logic101.net
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladylib
Schools would be sued today if they ignored something like that.

I don't know. John Stossel did an hour-long report on school bullying last year and his report corresponded with what I experienced in jr. high back in the early 70s. One girl was hounded so mercilessly that she killed herself. Her parents were so obtuse that even after a suicide attempt they put their daughter back in school with the assurance from the school personnel that they would "handle the problem." In her suicide note she said that she couldn't take the bullying any longer. The parents are now suing the school.

Interspersed with this heart-rending story were interviews with self-proclaimed bullies of various ages. All of them said they "liked to see them cry" when speaking of their victims. The motivation was similar for all of them. They were "nothings" in school but being the bully made them something. Their cockiness spoke volumes about how (little) they are disciplined.

There was a lot of hidden camera video shown in the special. The bullying starts early and, in a way, the most horrible bullying was the relatively "mild" bullying of elementary school. In one scene a boy is shown walking around by himself at recess. The only time any kids would interact with him would be to make fun of him or punch him. After being kicked and punched by one group of kids he ran to the other side of the playground. After 10 minutes he came back to be abused again. Why? A psychologist said that it's worse to be alone than to be an abused member of "the pack."

I used to call school (especially middle school) "The Lord of the Flies." I have seen nothing to change that judgement.

135 posted on 10/18/2002 5:38:26 AM PDT by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: fone
I have a C note that says I know the race of these little animals..........but I suppose that makes me racist to even bring it up.

It's just a cultural thing, ya know.

136 posted on 10/18/2002 5:40:48 AM PDT by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DWSUWF
Everyone knows that a concrete block should be included with the rapists in the sack

Throw a weasel or a dog in the sack before you throw it in the water. Maybe a poisonous snake.
137 posted on 10/18/2002 7:05:24 AM PDT by johnb838
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: DWSUWF
How about burying the teach up to his or her waist and then letting people throw stones at him/her until dead.
138 posted on 10/18/2002 7:07:40 AM PDT by johnb838
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: mhking
Next you'll try to tell me that the 10 and 11 year old animals who were part of the mob that murdered that man in Milwaukee were "exposed" so they should get a slap on the wrist

I heard on the news yesterday that the parents of the little animals have complained to the NAACP that their "children" are only being tried as adults because they are black.
139 posted on 10/18/2002 7:10:53 AM PDT by johnb838
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: johnb838
"...Throw a weasel or a dog in the sack before you throw it in the water. Maybe a poisonous snake..."

I can go with the snake, but I'd hate to waste a weasel and couldn't stand to sacrifice a dog that way.

140 posted on 10/18/2002 7:23:46 AM PDT by DWSUWF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-159 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson