Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

North Korea admits to having nukes, ties to Iraq/Syria ballistic missle sales
Yahoo!News_mds ^ | 10162002 | Nukes Suck

Posted on 10/16/2002 8:54:29 PM PDT by livis_dad

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: Linda Liberty
"I think this is really dumb on a lot of counts. First, we have to take on Iraq immediately precisely because they do not yet have nukes, but may gain them if we wait."

Well, I certainly don't think it's dumb to want to know exactly why we are being told we MUST launch a pre-emptive strike against a sovereign nation, especially when we can't even muster up the courage to declare war. You argue that Iraq must be dealt with "precisely because they do not yet have nukes." In other words, they currently pose no threat. Following that logic, we should take out Mugabe in Zimbabwe for the same reason. He may one day decide to dabble in nuclear research, and if he can murder white farmers to take their land, who knows what else he may be capable of doing?

"If Iraq had nukes, we sure as hell wouldn't be about to launch a conventional attack... in response they'd send one into NYC in a cargo container and where would we be then?.....Saddam is an imminent threat because he's a madman and hates us."

If Iraq nuked one of our cities, we would respond in kind. Saddam may be evil, but he's not stupid. He is not an Islamic fundamentalist bent on sacrificing his life in a nuclear suicide bombing.

"He tried to assassinate Bush senior, he torched the Kuwaiti oil fields in hopes of creating a nuclear winter."

Much of this is speculation. Like I said, Saddam may be evil, but he isn't stupid. Do you honestly think that he really believed burning a few oil fields would create a nuclear winter? Burning the Kuwaiti oil fields was more a result of the attitude "If I can't have it, then you can't either."

"I have no real doubt he'd nuke us as his dying act if he could. The Korean dictator mostly just wants to be left alone to oppress the Korean people."

What evidence do you have of this? What act of aggression did Hussein carry out against the United States that convinces you he is an imminent threat? He invaded Kuwait because he wanted their oil. He had no reason to believe at the time that we would retaliate. Up until then, he was still considered an "ally" in our ongoing conflict with Iran. We even funded him and armed him through the CIA. Again, Hussein isn't suicidal. Iraq isn't even an Islamic fundamentalist nation. It is a secular society. He may cheer on terrorists in their jihad, but that doesn't mean he has a death wish.

I happen to think that I have raised some legitimate concerns. I apparently disagree with most people here on FR, but the questions I have raised are ones that have not been answered to my satisfaction. Sorry if that upsets you, but as far as I'm concerned, the burden of proof is on those who are calling for yet another undeclared war.

To be honest, I never take anything our government says at face value. How can I believe them? They say we need to bomb Iraq for the good of the country. That's the same reasoning they give for everything else--higher taxes, gun control, more education spending, Campaign Finance Reform, etc. How anyone can simply accept what Washington says about national security when the same politicians have been disarming us and allowing illegal immigrants to overrun us puzzles me.

21 posted on 10/17/2002 10:25:16 AM PDT by sheltonmac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: sheltonmac
Now sheltonmac, you know the ONLY difference is that Iraq has OIL!!!

Obvious, eh?

22 posted on 10/17/2002 11:59:41 AM PDT by dixierat22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kabar
Excellent post.
23 posted on 10/17/2002 12:01:51 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sheltonmac
Much of this is speculation. Like I said, Saddam may be evil, but he isn't stupid.... What evidence do you have of this? What act of aggression did Hussein carry out against the United States that convinces you he is an imminent threat?

As far as I understand, there is no doubt whatever that Saddam attempted to assassinate the former President Bush, shortly after Clinton was elected. This was an act of madness and aggression, with no utility to him whatsoever save pure spite and considerable potential cost. The sensible response from us would have been to do whatever it took to go get him, whereas at the time we were pretty much leaving him alone. If he would do that, he would nuke NYC out of pure spite.

24 posted on 10/17/2002 12:19:09 PM PDT by Linda Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson