To: savedbygrace
They'll just have to wait in line. Iraq's next. Well... isn't that spatial? the Church Lady asked. While W's tunnel vision aims at Iraq's ineffective improvisations, our real enemyes, the ones who do proliferate WMD and WMD technologies, are getting their nukes. Only 2-3 short years after they tested the missiles that could drive their nukes into our cities. And... what to our FR people conclude? They'll have to wait in line. We must waste our young boys live's so that we accomplish absolutely nothing in Iraq.
To: A Vast RightWing Conspirator
![](http://users.wi.net/~johnh/ronnie.JPG)
"Trust, but verify" (with a first-in-the-world exoatmospheric kill vehicle).
75 posted on
10/16/2002 5:46:53 PM PDT by
ChadGore
To: A Vast RightWing Conspirator
FWIW, in one post you've made more assumptions than I have time to count. Almost all of them wrong, BTW.
Moving right past the first two or three incorrect assumptions, I have to remind you that the USA really is going after Iraq next, whether you or I agree.
From that simple fact, you read a lot into my simple words that wasn't there.
To: A Vast RightWing Conspirator
Oh good grief .. could ya yell any louder??
96 posted on
10/16/2002 6:30:31 PM PDT by
Mo1
To: A Vast RightWing Conspirator
It might help you let off steam, but the only thing the giant blue font does for the rest of us is make it hard to read what you said.
To: A Vast RightWing Conspirator
I believe that you have it backwards. China has no intention of nuking us yet. She's just rattling sabers for Iraq. Why? She'd be quite happy to let Iraq nuke us and let Iraq suffer the retaliation. She's trying to weaken the US through proxy.
Zemin didn't make that tour to Panama, Cuba, et all for the sightseeing. He was looking for proxies.
To: A Vast RightWing Conspirator
I remember someone defining a fanatic as one who increases the volume of his argument as reason eludes him.
305 posted on
10/17/2002 8:50:54 AM PDT by
elfman2
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson