Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

With all the talk about the possible use of Nuclear weapons by eith the USA or Iraq, I found that this site gave a most balanced apprasial of weapons capabilities. Especially as far as the largest nuclear bomb possible, and the relative sizes of the ones used during World War II.
1 posted on 10/16/2002 9:29:49 AM PDT by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: vannrox
Except Iraq wouldn't have access to the multi-megaton devices described here. Those are hydro's. They'll only have access to fission devices, the largest of which I think is only half a megaton.
2 posted on 10/16/2002 9:56:09 AM PDT by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vannrox
Actually, the Novaya Zemlya bomb of October 30, 1961 was more like a 100 megaton bomb. Maybe to keep things from getting completly out of hand the last stage was "denatured."
Rederic
3 posted on 10/16/2002 10:01:02 AM PDT by rederic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vannrox
Any ideas what nukes would do to, oh, say.. black stone buildings holding meteorites?
5 posted on 10/16/2002 11:00:26 AM PDT by struwwelpeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head; VaBthang4; PsyOp; Gunrunner2
Big boom ping!
7 posted on 10/16/2002 12:12:59 PM PDT by spetznaz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vannrox
Interesting Big Bomb stuff, but what about the application and capabilities of small, low-yield tactical, rather than strategic, nuclear devices-- battlefield nukes like the ones deployed (but, my understanding, never used) by the South Africa Army during the Namibian War.
12 posted on 10/16/2002 4:26:29 PM PDT by Condorman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson