Skip to comments.
Republican Strategy if Sniper is Al Queda.
copycat's litter box ^
| 10/15/02
| copycat
Posted on 10/15/2002 8:15:05 PM PDT by copycat
IF it turns out that the sniper is Al Queda, and signs are beginning to point towards that truth, first of all, the economy is OUT as an election issue for the next 3 weeks.
The sniper story is already consuming all the oxygen available on the cable networks. Torricelli can't be heard? NO-ONE can be heard.
There is a strategy that will either win Republicans valuable votes in this years close election, or give them a victory in Congress on a contentious issue. It is this...
IF the sniper is Al Queda, the right must immediately point out that the left is holding up the Homeland Security legislation, in the interest of creating more unionized Democrat voters.
These snipers are not going to be caught so soon that this issue will not be going on for the next three weeks. Iraq is gone as an issue, the Economy is in recovery and the Dow went up 1000 points recently...the SNIPER IS THE ISSUE, so Homeland Security IS the issue.
It's time to develop the slogans needed to illustrate that the left is playing politics with the safety of the American people.
TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: alqueda; sniper; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
"The Democrat Party is playing politics with Homeland Security while the American people are being gunned down in the street."
1
posted on
10/15/2002 8:15:05 PM PDT
by
copycat
To: copycat
There is a strategy that will either win Republicans valuable votes in this years close election, or give them a victory in Congress on a contentious issue. If Bush pushes hard for the Homeland Security act RIGHT NOW, with the sniper all over the airwaves, he could force the Dems to capitulate, or appear to care more about their own power than the security of a free state.
2
posted on
10/15/2002 8:17:43 PM PDT
by
copycat
To: copycat
Daschle: "We ought not go after the sniper until the issue of pensions for law enforcement workers is settled."
-PJ
To: Political Junkie Too
LOL.
4
posted on
10/15/2002 8:21:42 PM PDT
by
copycat
To: copycat
Paul Begala basically said tonight, that GW is responsible for the killings, because of the WH's coolness to the fingerprinting issue. Won't make any difference if the shooter is Osama bin Laden, the Democrats are ginning up to blame the gun nuts,ie: Republicans. Enron didn't work, the tax cut didn't work,Iraq didn't work-the Democrats are like drowning men-grasping at anything to save themselves and they think the sniper is their issue.
To: copycat
These snipers are not going to be caught so soon that this issue will not be going on for the next three weeks. I truly hope the sniper(s) ARE caught ASAP, but even if they were caught tomorrow, the fresh memory of Americans being shot at random by an Islamist, contrasted with the Democrats holding up of the Homeland Security Act makes for a tasty TV spot.
6
posted on
10/15/2002 8:25:48 PM PDT
by
copycat
To: Wild Irish Rogue
Paul Begala basically said tonight, that GW is responsible for the killings, because of the WH's coolness to the fingerprinting issue. So let's let the people decide...are people being killed because of weak gun laws, or a weak Homeland Security Department.
7
posted on
10/15/2002 8:27:14 PM PDT
by
copycat
To: copycat
Re:
. .and signs are beginning to point towards that truth . . It's still a big IF, and if we jump the gun and get it wrong, we're toast.
I agree that HOMELAND SECURITY is a homerun issue for us during midterms (the dems knowingly, willingly and intentionaly draged their feet for special interests). The amazing thing is, we owned that issue before the sniper, and we'll own it after the sniper is sniped.
We don't know who he/she/they is/are, and assuming may be political suicide.
The upside? The gun-grabbing-libs are going to alienate the swing voteers, increase NRA memership, and cost themselves seats in the process.
patience grasshopper :)
8
posted on
10/15/2002 8:28:35 PM PDT
by
ChadGore
To: copycat
IF the sniper is Al Queda then this must be about big oil. Bush wants to build a pipe line from the Oval Office to the four gas stations where the shootings occurred.
9
posted on
10/15/2002 8:32:37 PM PDT
by
Democrap
To: copycat
The shooter is obviously a Democrat. He doesn't work weekends.
10
posted on
10/15/2002 8:34:46 PM PDT
by
Inyokern
To: Wild Irish Rogue
"the Democrats are like drowning men-grasping at anything to save themselves and they think the sniper is their issue"
The only anti-Bush position they can take, is pro-sniper, and with that, they are stepping into the crosshairs, themselves.
11
posted on
10/15/2002 8:36:15 PM PDT
by
spoiler2
To: Democrap
Ugh -- its sickening to use this stuff for political gains. A DNC ploy. I know the DNC has it all planned out already; two fax machines lined up with two different press memos waiting to go out. If the sniper is middle-eastern then they'll refocus attention of the failing economy -- which is hard to do since it keeps recovering. If the sniper is an America then they'll criticize Bush for preventing gun-control and condemning white America and the NRA for promoting the sniper. I'd just like to see Hollywood stop using guns in movies.
12
posted on
10/15/2002 8:38:05 PM PDT
by
Naspino
To: copycat
The stock market hates uncertainty. The stock market went up 1,000 points since the Iraq resolution was passed.
13
posted on
10/15/2002 8:39:08 PM PDT
by
exit82
To: spoiler2
Bumping for later comments.
To: copycat
Watching Nightline right now (ABC).
They are presenting the sniper as terrorism. (de facto terrorism whether or not he is part of a terrorist group or not)... the same net effect on the public as intentional terrorism.
To: Naspino
Maybe someone should point out to our democrap friends that snipers in Israel dont last long. But of course every citizen carrys an assault rifle there. humm.
16
posted on
10/15/2002 8:45:22 PM PDT
by
Democrap
To: spoiler2
The only anti-Bush position they can take, is pro-sniper, and with that, they are stepping into the crosshairs, themselves. Right, the left is trying to blame Bush. They think they've found an issue with the "ballistic fingerprinting" that they can attack Bush with, but banging the "Homeland Security" gong right now from the bully pulpit would drown that right out, IMHO.
17
posted on
10/15/2002 8:45:50 PM PDT
by
copycat
To: Naspino
Ugh -- its sickening to use this stuff for political gains. You are correct, it is sickening, but WE didn't start it. With the left willing to break NJ election law to win at all costs, we must use the weapons that are available to us, or perish.
18
posted on
10/15/2002 8:48:04 PM PDT
by
copycat
To: Wild Irish Rogue
Who the hell is this Begala guy, and why does anyone pay any attention to him... what a maroon.
To: copycat
There's been too many examples of domestic terrorists or just plain looneys to make that presumption. The public certainly isn't. And as pointed out, if you jump the gun too soon, you'll reverse the effect you seek.
20
posted on
10/15/2002 8:52:36 PM PDT
by
RonF
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson