To: Maceman
One question, why would the teams share one rifle? Meeting with one another for the exchange would virtually eliminate the advantage of seperate teams.
To: sharktrager
Doah!!!....there goes that theory...
4 posted on
10/15/2002 10:15:32 AM PDT by
iranger
To: sharktrager
Might be one shooter, with a team to provide the logistical and operational support (casing locations, procuring vehicles, spotting, etc)
7 posted on
10/15/2002 10:21:01 AM PDT by
LouD
To: sharktrager
why would the teams share one rifleI could be wrong, but I don't believe anyone has established that the exact same rifle was used in all these killings. Same type, sure, but is anyone really saying "same rifle" especially since fragments is all they are getting.
To: sharktrager
Do we know it is the same rifle, or just same .223 caliber or maybe we don't even know what the police know.
Personally, I think it is one team with access to multiple vehicles. Like from the jobs of one or more of the team members.
IMHO ...
It is time to look at the obvious, Al Queda. First anthrax, now this. Same source, same aim, terrorize people and show the helplessness of the police/government to prevent.
If it is not, then I will be surprised. But wouldn't care a wit, as long as the perps are caught and burned.
snooker
48 posted on
10/15/2002 11:14:05 AM PDT by
snooker
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson