[Condorman]

The pattern continues.

Every time a blue sentence starts with "So yes" or "So no" you are guarenteed that the conclusion to follow is a study in applied stupidity.

[general_re]

It's kind of like watching Johnny Cochran try to make a closing argument while on acid - he knows where he's supposed to be going, but can't manage to string together the chain of thought that will take him there. And you get this long stream of semi-lucid nonsense, finishing up with "So there! I'm right and you're wrong!"

[Condorman]

while you do not have the time to show what you claim are errors in my statements, you do have the time and desire to insult. How lame. How dishonest.
365 posted on 10/19/02 11:44 AM Eastern by gore3000

I am truly amazed how so many evolutionists ... are unable to discuss the issues rationally and instead need to resort to insults.
371 posted on 10/19/02 12:17 PM Eastern by gore3000

None of you evo losers has shown any of my quotes to be false. In fact I almost always post not just a quote but a link to the complete article. Still you guys dishonestly claim that my quotes are false.
389 posted on 10/19/02 9:43 PM Eastern by gore3000

AND YOU WERE SHOWN AGAIN THAT YOU WERE WRONG only thing is that instead of admitting it, or dropping the subject you continue with your moronic assertion
399 posted on 10/19/02 11:44 PM Eastern by gore3000

PROVE ME A LIAR. You do not answer but you sure insult people. Keep your mouth shut if all you can do is insult and have nothing else to say. Lame slimer.
400 posted on 10/19/02 11:46 PM Eastern by gore3000

You have not shown me to be a liar about anything. Do not ascribe to others your own lack of morals.
406 posted on 10/20/02 3:42 AM Eastern by gore3000

Junior: Various quotes taken out of context...
Which of course, with you being a sliming liar you cannot tell which they are [sic] or discuss them honestly.
413 posted on 10/20/02 10:54 AM Eastern by gore3000

With you evos, the proof is always somewhere else where no one can see it. All you slimers can do is lie about people you can never discuss the facts. Let's see you show an 'out of context quote' from me.
416 posted on 10/20/02 1:34 PM Eastern by gore3000

Tired of the repeated bleatings, I posted a series that directly addressed the claims (detailed above) denying that quotes had ever been misrepresented, and that never had it been demonstrated otherwise:

At your request, these are the facts. For all the world to see. Based on these facts one is led to the seemingly obvious conlusion that you are engaging in mischaracterization, misquoting, and dishonesty bordering on pathological. This is your opportunity to discuss the facts, and offer an alternate theory, additional information, or some other rational explanation for your behavior. You have the floor.
424 posted on 10/21/02 12:38 PM Eastern by Condorman

True to form, the only response was this:

That [is] a slime. It answers nothing except that you cannot engage in honest discussion.
440 posted on 10/22/02 11:14 PM Eastern by gore3000

---

"A key clue -- with the Web we're all journalists. We all have a credibility account, which we protect by playing-straight and piss-away through dishonesty. What's the Web mean, and do, for this equation? It gives hope to new entrants -- the cost of entry is no longer ink by the barrel, just readers by the score. But it doesn't change the basic equation. Nor will it. Credibility remains the coin of the realm." Dana Blankenhorn, 1997