[Bonaparte]

BTW, as I demonstrated in post 40, virtually everything you claimed about ID in your post 32 is false. Dembski himself, the leading proponent of ID, makes this abundantly clear in the extended quoted passage I offered above.

Not that you will every admit this.

[<1/1,000,000th%]

Dembski himself, the leading proponent of ID, makes this abundantly clear in the extended quoted passage I offered above.

Not that you will every admit this.

Well, I did read this:

For instance, design theorists recognize that the nature, moral character and purposes of this intelligence lie beyond the remit of science.

So why is it called Intelligent Design? I would like to see the evidence for the designer though. So far the only evidence has been "evolution is wrong".