It's here. The careful reader, a classification which eliminates certain blue people, will notice that the fugu genome people predict the existence of 1000 currently unrecognized human genes from their study of the fugu. Which, needless to say, is not the same as showing the existence of 1000 previously unrecognized human genes. I seem to recall that some patient explaining on the difference between the two has already been undertaken, but it seems to have passed without impact.
It can detect submarines at 100 miles?
I am somewhat reliably assured that you are significantly underestimating the capabilities of the Navy. ;)
To: gore3000
AND YOU WERE SHOWN AGAIN THAT YOU WERE WRONG
I was not wrong. You have quoted others out of context dishonestly.
What the liar Junior calls a "dishonest quote" is the summary and conclusion of the Origing of the Species posted in Post# 357
Shows the utter dishonesty of both you and Junior.
I also note that the you, being a liar, do not quote from the article on the fugu fish for your attack, because then you could not slime me. The article says:
And by comparing the sequence of genes in the fugu with those of what's known about the 30,000 or so human genes, the scientists say they have discovered nearly 1,000 in the fish that are apparently identical to previously unidentified ones in humans.
From: Humans are Three Percent Puffer Fish .