[Bonaparte]

Post 40 is intended for your eyes also.

[<1/1,000,000th%]

Unlike scientific creationism, intelligent design does not prejudge such questions as 'Who is the designer?' or 'How does the designer go about designing and building things?'

But it does postulate the designer. If not, then call it something else then we can really get talking. I realize there are many ID positions, maybe somebody's ready to jump the gap.

[stanz]

Since you say post #40 is intended for my eyes, let me say that I think Patrick Henry is right in stating that proponents of ID have another agenda in mind. Scientific Creationism has no place in the public school system. It is not science. It is intended to teach religion under the guise of scientific inquiry. Any rational thinker will reject the attempts of the religious community to stifle fact based on evidence and conclusions reached by testing.The only apparitions IMHO are the ones that cloud the minds of those embracing Intelligent Design.