Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jennyp
Jenny, you're dealing with people who can't grasp the basic principles of biology -- with all the tangible evidence in the world staring them in the face. How do you expect them to deal with something as abstract as economics? How can they handle an analogy between ID and a centrally planned economy? I think you're the greatest, but as Dirty Harry always said: "A man's gotta know his limitations."
332 posted on 10/18/2002 4:21:32 PM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies ]


To: PatrickHenry
Man, I would love to compare portfolios… LOL!
A little tip, invest in defense contractors (specifically General Dynamics) and…

Well, we are talking philosophy here – does that bother you?

334 posted on 10/18/2002 4:30:45 PM PDT by Heartlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
Stating that, with NO evidence in support thereof, that evolution is more self-evident than creation, is in and of itself the height of self-deception.

Is it any wonder??? What a bunch of loons...
339 posted on 10/18/2002 4:58:53 PM PDT by ApesForEvolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry; Heartlander
How can they handle an analogy between ID and a centrally planned economy?

This gives me a chuckle. You must understand the red statement is from a "Biblical scholar" that is confused by the figurative. Earth on stilts.

340 posted on 10/18/2002 5:15:04 PM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
Jenny, you're dealing with people who can't grasp the basic principles of biology

Do you know them? Does not seem like it since all you post is insults but never refute any scientific statements made on these threads. Want to take a shot at one? Let's see you show it to be wrong:

Evolutionists are always making assumptions. They assumed that the tonsils and the appendix were remnants of previous species from which humans had evolved and were totally useless. They were wrong about that. When the human genome was sequenced and it was found that only 5% of it was used in genes they immediately assumed that the 95% not in genes was 'junk'. They were wrong again of course. The now called 'non-coding' DNA is the source of what makes humans tick and a marvel of creation in itself.

368 posted on 10/19/2002 9:06:02 AM PDT by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
I think you're the greatest, but as Dirty Harry always said: "A man's gotta know his limitations."

Some people never learn.

369 posted on 10/19/2002 9:07:44 AM PDT by balrog666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson