You've missed the point. Again. Most people are capable of seeing the contradiction between Dembski's statement, "Intelligent design is a strictly scientific theory devoid of religious commitments, " and the title of the book in which he makes it, "Intelligent Design: The Bridge Between Science and Theology."
It's got nothing to do with politics or ideology. The point is consistency, which, obviously is beyond you.
You've missed the point.
Nope. I did not miss your point. I just find it irrelevant. It is the usual evolutionist rhetorical games. What is important in science is the truth, how it is found is not important. If you exclude possibilities out of hand like evolutionists try to do, then whatever result you come up with cannot be said to be the truth. Only when one examines the evidence without presupositions can one arrive at the truth.