You haven't posted a reference for this piece of utter nonsense. Your wish is my command:
You will notice that all the linear joins are the same, therefore there is no chemical reason for preferring one join over the other. The only chemical bond, and this is a necessary one is lateral between the two strands.
Being that you claim to be a professor and to have special knowledge of the subject at hand one must therefore ask whether:
1. You have been making a false claim of special knowledge.
OR
2. You have been dishonestly arguing against something you know to be true.
Either way, your credibility is now a big fat
ZERO.
These are schematics denoting the connectivity of the covalent bonds, not structures. Go email Michael Behe and ask him if they realistically represent the three-dimensional structure of DNA, and particularly the non-bonding interactions.
Evidently you don't know the difference. Go check out the little computer program whose link I posted, read the papers by Breslauer and others, and get back to me. You're ignorant, and you're not even on the first step of the way to knowledge, awareness of your ignorance.
Being that you claim to be a professor and to have special knowledge of the subject at hand one must therefore ask whether:
You seem to be unduly obsessed the fact that I have a Ph.D. in biophysics and teach this subject at the graduate level, Gore3000. Let's talk about your credentials. Did you finish high school?