Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. 5th Circuit Declares Gun Posession A 'Crime Of Violence'
US Courts.gov ^ | 10/11/2002 | 5th Circuit Court

Posted on 10/14/2002 4:22:48 PM PDT by tarawa

This appeal presents the question whether the crime pf possession of a "prohibited weapon", specifically a sawed-off shotgun, under Texas law constitutes a crime of violence under Federal sentencing guidelines.

Ruben Serna pleaded guilty to possessing a firearm as a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1). At sentencing, the district court found Serna's previous state court felony conviction for possession of a prohibited weapon was a crime of violence and enhanced his sentence on that basis.

The indictment underlying this previous state court conviction identified the prohibited weapon as a "shotgun with a barrel length of less than 18 inches." This type of weapon is commonly known as a sawed-off shotgun. It is reasonable to conclude that a sawed-off shotgun, when possessed unlawfully, is possessed for violent purposes only.

(Excerpt) Read more at ca5.uscourts.gov ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: banglist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: *bang_list

41 posted on 10/15/2002 4:58:07 AM PDT by Joe Brower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #42 Removed by Moderator

To: tarawa
I know everyone hates jury duty, but I am the opposite due to hope.
It would be better than winning the lottery if I was on a jury debating something like this. I'd have the opportunity to make the NFA unconstitutional through jury nullification (I'm just dreaming here, I know)...
43 posted on 10/15/2002 5:39:17 AM PDT by RandallFlagg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: watcher1
"Where is the President and Attorney General?"

Conducting an international campaign against Muslim terrorism?

44 posted on 10/15/2002 11:12:51 AM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
"No one's right to self-protection is abrogated when they can't carry around a sawed-off shotgun in the trunk."

Well, the whole point of having a sawed-off shotgun is that you don't NEED to carry it around in the trunk.
You can keep it right to hand.

At least "us people" know what a firearm is for. But for the errors of an unopposed and misguided Supreme Court decision 70 years ago, short-barreled shotguns would be just as legal as they were in my father's day.
"Snake-charmers" are what he called them.

45 posted on 10/15/2002 11:20:53 AM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: tarawa
Just looks to me like this fellow has a strong basis for a Supreme Court appeal, and a likely reversal of at least part of the "Miller" decision.
46 posted on 10/15/2002 11:22:10 AM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tarawa
From the judgement:
"Two months after Ruben Serna’s release from prison, the police executed a search of his home in Texas.
During the search, the police discovered a loaded Star, model Firestar, .40 caliber chrome plated pistol."

Woohoo!
Chrome plating!
A sure sign of criminal intent!

47 posted on 10/15/2002 11:28:10 AM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
when i was growing up we would buy a $20.00 .410 single barrel and cut the stock to make a pistol grip and cut the barrel very , very short....to make a "snake pistol"...when you're hanging over the front of a boat in the middle of the night on a dark bayou to catch a frog in your right hand...it is a good idea to have ur snake pistol in ur other hand....moccasins like frogs too!!!!
48 posted on 10/15/2002 11:36:12 AM PDT by cajun-jack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus
I've got a picture for YOU:
Sad little would-be "Black Panthers," pathetically strutting up and down outside the '00 GOP State Convention in Houston, carrying their AK-47's openly.
Unmolested by the police, since what they were doing was plainly legal, and largely unnoticed by the delegates and other passersby.

Maybe baseball bats ARE "illegal" here - but openly-carried firearms are not!
49 posted on 10/15/2002 11:38:40 AM PDT by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

Comment #50 Removed by Moderator

Comment #51 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson