btw, given the recent humiliation of Yasshole,
i've not seen anyone mention pali symps as a possibility here.
hmmmm ...
Tame? Maybe in the number of casualties. But not tame in the affect it has on Americans. What is happening now, is far scarier to most Americans than a US Embassy being bombed overseas, or the bombing of the US Cole. All of their plans to terrorize us can not be of the magnitude of the WTC/Pentagon attacks.
These guys are sending a message that absolutely no American is safe anywhere.
They can kill you while you're pumping gas, washing your car, mowing your lawn, going to school, shopping at Michael's, waiting for the bus, etc..
You can't protect yourself by staying out of nightclubs, federal buildings or by not flying.
Stay home and they'll come and shoot you on your own lawn or driveway.
Any American can be shot to death at any time. Age, gender, race, religion, social status, employment has nothing to do with it.
That's the definition of terror.
You make a good point, but it's possible that security here in the States has been just too hot for AQ to try to take on, so they go for something simple like picking off one citizen at a time, thereby terrorizing the entire D.C. area.
Michelle Malkin is on FNC right now saying that the AQ training tapes has this type of scenario covered.
Another thing that I want to address, even though you didn't say it, is that lots of "experts" on TV are saying that it can't be AQ because they haven't taken credit for the sniper attacks. They base that on the premise that terrorists always take credit for their work. They never did take credit for 9/11, so that blows that theory.
I don't know if it's Al Qaeda or a domestic nutjob. I'm keeping an open mind about who it could be. I hope that it's not Al Qaeda, because if it is, if the perp is apprehended, there will be more people waiting in the wings to pick up where he left off.