Skip to comments.
Cleric calls for seizure of dogs and their owners
afp ^
| October 13, 2002
Posted on 10/13/2002 9:55:09 AM PDT by Ranger
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Comment #21 Removed by Moderator
To: aristeides
Northern Tehran is the wealthier part of Tehran. Which means what, exactly? They own bigger piles of rocks, dirt and rags than the poverty-stricken Southerners?
To: dighton
I didn't realize my screen name was also a prediction.
23
posted on
10/13/2002 11:35:37 AM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: Hank Rearden
They've got fancier shops and restaurants, and they're much more unhappy about the restrictions imposed on life by the Islamic Republic.
To: Dog Gone
I didn't realize my screen name was also a prediction.A false one, IMHO. The dogs will stay; the mullahs will soon be gone.
;-)
25
posted on
10/13/2002 11:48:50 AM PDT
by
dighton
To: Ranger
If dogs are "unclean", what does that make the mulahs and prayer leaders? Bathing is considered an odd ritual, if not "sinful", and toilet paper is unheard of (they use the left hand - the right is for eating - really!).
However, I can understand their objections. Dogs are loyal to their owners; that is the right of the Islamic leaders to have slavishly loyal servants - the peasants!
MARK A SITY
http://www.logic101.net/
To: Ranger
A new meaning for "everyone and his dog..."
27
posted on
10/13/2002 12:41:20 PM PDT
by
TopQuark
To: Sungirl
Now, why do they hate us?
28
posted on
10/13/2002 12:41:58 PM PDT
by
TopQuark
To: Ranger
Another reminder that Islam is a religion of peace.
Comment #30 Removed by Moderator
Comment #31 Removed by Moderator
To: Ranger
Kewel,
Being a Mad Dawg, I can feel secure no islamist will want to own me.
32
posted on
10/13/2002 2:35:55 PM PDT
by
Mad Dawg
To: I_Love_My_Husband
Even little bitty dogs will run under a Mullah's dress and bite him on his itty bitty thingamabob.
To: I still care
I wonder what a flaming bag of dog poop on the front porch does? Angel repelant?
34
posted on
10/13/2002 2:57:20 PM PDT
by
Ranger
To: dighton; Dawgsquat
Brudder, this story makes me need a drink ...
To: Ranger
In June the police banned the sale of dogs and stipulated penalties for dog walking in public, which is seen by (ragtop)conservatives as a sign of the corrupting influence of decadent Western culture.Good grief! By now, everybody knows that proud, self-respecting Islamowacks disapprove of dogs; they greatly (ahem) "prefer" goats, of course. Really cute, affectionate goats. Just another indication of their superior culture, donchya know?
To: Ranger
"I demand the judiciary arrest all dogs with long, medium or short legs together with their long-legged owners..." Dogs with no legs at all aren't very popular pets. "Fetch the stick" takes hours...
To: Ranger; All
From the hadith of Sahih Bukhari:
Volume 4, Book 54, Number 539:
Narrated Abu Talha:
The Prophet said, "Angels do not enter a house witch has either a dog or a picture in it."
Volume 4, Book 54, Number 540:
Narrated 'Abdullah bin 'Umar:
Allah's Apostle ordered that the dogs should be killed.
To: knighthawk
Volume 4, Book 54, Number 540:
Narrated 'Abdullah bin 'Umar:
Allah's Apostle ordered that the dogs should be killed.This helps to explain a lot about the Muzzies; since they apparently offed all their intellectuals early in the game...
To: Sungirl
We do agree for the most part. The only good Muslims are the ones who don't really know/believe what their religion teaches and what Mohammed really was.
And unlike Jerry Falwell I ain't gonna backtrack.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson