Look at what you're arguing. You're attempting to use what they haven't said as some sort of proof that they must know what they're doing.
Please tell me you aren't trying to convince me that a lack of evidence is actually a good reason to attack Iraq.
I'm not trying to convince you of anything!
You are a lost cause!
What I'm trying to bring to the general debate is the fact that our intelligence gathering departments know a helluva lot more about what is going on that we do, and that's the way it should be.
I happen to believe in my President.
If he says there is credible evidence present to attack Iraq, then I'd hit them tonight.