Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MeeknMing
"...After hearing about Friday's killing in Virginia, Ms. Glazier promptly drove to a gas station near her home, reasoning that the sniper could not cover 30-plus miles so quickly.

"The first thing I thought ... was that I should go buy gas because he's not right here," Ms. Glazier said. "Which is horrible to say..."

Why is it 'horrible' to describe a field expedient method for reducing the odds of being shot by a sniper?

She has stumbled onto a reasonably good method for reducing the likelihood of being attacked, and she regards her reporting of it as a "...horrible thing to say...".

I'd bet the rent that she's a liberal, and that she's wracked with a mindless, free floating guilt about any number of advantages or lucky breaks that she enjoys.

Hey Glazier... If what you're doing prompts you to use a word like 'horrible' to describe it, you MUST stop doing it now. It's simply not fair for you to employ a method that puts you at a competitive advantage over others like this.

Pin a target on your blouse and stand somewhere very still in that urban hell-hole you live in, for as long as you can, every day.

Only in this way will you be able to take a first step toward purging yourself of the horrible horrible-ness of the unfair advantage you have stolen from the people.

8 posted on 10/13/2002 6:52:42 AM PDT by DWSUWF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DWSUWF
I was also struck by her guilty-sounding statement. When I first read it, I thought to myself: "there's a smart woman", then read on and thought she was just another wishy washy loser....
9 posted on 10/13/2002 7:11:41 AM PDT by Mr. Bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson