Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nuke'm Glowing
You are playing semantics, a drug smuggler is a drug smuggler, not an "invading enemy force", regardless of what you say.
59 posted on 10/14/2002 9:21:29 AM PDT by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: Luis Gonzalez
"I suggest better communications between US and Mexican Border patrols are needed, rather than gunships to start an idiotic and not needed border war."

Much like the b.s. comment that "an illegal immigrant is not an illegal immigrant but an economically deprived individual looking for freedom" that we've heard over and over on television. Bunk. A "War on Drugs" was declared decades ago. The "War on Terrorism" was declared by Bush II. The truth is that if we really were at war our borders would be sealed tight. I'm not the one using "semantics", it's the politicians. And they are the ones who are helping the terrorists and drug dealers to kill Americans on a daily basis.
66 posted on 10/14/2002 12:24:55 PM PDT by Nuke'm Glowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: Luis Gonzalez
You are playing semantics, a drug smuggler is a drug smuggler, not an "invading enemy force", regardless of what you say.

Invader => mexican military => drug smuggler

The invader is in the mexican military and is protecting drug smugglers.

The invader is a smuggler who is smuggling drugs.

The invader is a coyote who is smuggling in terrorists. Would you also classify terrorists as just terrorists and not invaders?

BTW, Did you forget that several of the 9/11 hijackers recieved false documentation from illegal immigrants south of the border?

112 posted on 10/15/2002 9:11:18 PM PDT by PuNcH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson