Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FreeReign
"More newsworthy would be to see a gunman who was not armed."

Ok, ok, I have to play Devil's Advocate, here. Let's say a gunman walks into a bank and shoots people. He is armed, correct? Now, the security guard throws down his donut and tackles him to the floor. The gun goes sliding under the dress of a woman asleep in the waiting area. The man under the security guard on the floor is still the gunman, correct? He is now unarmed, correct? :)

I have too much time on my hands. Going to join the pep rally in the living room. GO SOONERS!!!
184 posted on 10/12/2002 9:47:46 AM PDT by OkieDokieSmokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: OkieDokieSmokie
"More newsworthy would be to see a gunman who was not armed."

Ok, ok, I have to play Devil's Advocate, here. Let's say a gunman walks into a bank and shoots people. He is armed, correct? Now, the security guard throws down his donut and tackles him to the floor. The gun goes sliding under the dress of a woman asleep in the waiting area. The man under the security guard on the floor is still the gunman, correct? He is now unarmed, correct? :)

HaaHaHa, I too was thinking that there are cases where a gunman doesn't have to be armed. But I didn't think anybody would call me on it.

...also, definition #2 in my Websters says a gunman is a "person who makes guns". So a gunsmith on his lunch hour could also be an unarmed gunman ;)

186 posted on 10/12/2002 1:07:57 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson