No, the original title was apparently "Bush CAN'T take no for an answer" rather than "won't".
I clicked through the link supplied at the top of the article and the original title matches the one posted at the top of this thread. I prefer to do my own research on such simple matters -- took all of about five seconds.
Apparently Cyber Liberty didn't bother to check the title of the original article and chose to inject a slight-of-words deception (see his 2 post). Thus becoming blind and waiting for another blind person to follow. You know the cliché: the blind leading the blind.
I don't really see how this matters in terms of meaning but I guess if you are going to post garbage you had better be accurate.
My opinion on the article's merits is irrelevant and that's why I didn't offer one. That said, so is your opinion irrelevant to the issue of title accuracy. The point of my question to Admin Moderator was whether the person that posted the article changed the title. He didn't. He posted accurate.
The Admin Moderator in post 4 told the person that posted the article to use the original title. The Admin Moderator should have directed that at Cyber Liberty because it was Cyber Liberty that implied -- by slight-of-word deception -- that the person whom posted the article should post something other than the original title.