[BJungNan]

This case is for the legislature to work on, not the courts. The court ruled, now the legislature needs to make its intentions so clear the court can not interpret it any other way but the way they intended.

[steveegg]

The point is, the court has not ruled on the merits on the case; just the need for immediate relief on the part of Forrester and the Jersey Republicans. The fact that at least 5 justices found that there wasn't an immediate need for relief would tend to suggest that the merits would not be ruled on "correctly" (at least, as I see it), but upon further examination, there may well be a majority that sees it the way that I do (which is how Rehnquist, Scalia and Thomas saw Bush v Gore).