Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bommer
Surely the SCOTUS would see the urgency of this matter

It is clearly too late to change the ballots again. If we were concerned about overseas and military absentee ballots a week and a half ago, we're guilty of outrageous hypocrisy if we demand that the SCOTUS turn around and invalidate the Lautenberg ballots even today, never mind next week. Lautenberg's on the ballot, and on the ballot he'll stay. It's too late for any other course of action. Forrester needs to beat him.

15 posted on 10/11/2002 8:03:13 AM PDT by Lyford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Lyford
It is clearly too late to change the ballots again.

I don't know about that. Maybe the Rats have someone they like better than Lautenberg.

120 posted on 10/11/2002 9:49:22 AM PDT by Colonel_Flagg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Lyford
It appears to me that any military absentee ballot that came back voting for the Torch would be a Torch vote. Only Forrester could recieve any votes that would matter. So it works out for Forrester to keep the absentee ballots in play.
140 posted on 10/11/2002 10:25:38 AM PDT by Rockiesrider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson