Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: republicman
My my, did your frontpage.com / American Renaissance handlers ring the bell again? Your mind must be squirming like a toad.

Don't know the DA, myself. Does sound quite efficient, though - in capital cases such as this, any racial bias enhancement would be superfluous, as I said early on. There's nothing to be gained by investigating a moot point (as your frontpage.com / American Renaissance handlers call it), is there?

Let's cheer the lady on, shall we, and hope for a speedy guilty verdict & execution.

Your frontpage.com / American Renaissance handlers DO want a conviction, don't they? I mean, even without additional penalties due to race bias? I mean, dead will be OK for them? Or do they go for the Miracle Max 'multiple levels of dead' theory?

you've never addressed how your precious DA would put up all those suspurfluous counts but never even investigate whether it was a bias crime.

91 posted on 10/11/2002 2:42:11 PM PDT by Psycho Francis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]


To: Psycho Francis
Man I have seen some dumbasses on the web, but you have got to be the biggest one yet.

There's nothing "superfluous" about adding in a penalty.

If the jurors are stuck on whether to give them death or not, the addition might very well push them towards the death penalty they might not have chosen otherwise.

Doh!?!?!

Lets face it this poor excuse for a prosecutor didn't do her job and now these thugs may get to live out their whole lives at taxpayer expense because of it.

And here you are making excuses for her, idiot.
101 posted on 10/11/2002 7:36:16 PM PDT by Ensonicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson