1 posted on
10/10/2002 9:35:56 PM PDT by
kattracks
To: kattracks
"Hard-won" victory??? LMAO! The liberals who run the New York Times still don't get it. This vote was a slam dunk and even the Democrats know it, which is why they wanted to get Iraq off the political calendar as quickly as possible. That's why Tommy Daschund, despite signing an anti-war petition together with the Hildabeast on the Communist front group site NION, will cynically vote for the use of force resolution the President wants. Its the politics, stupid.
To: kattracks
I truly hope many of the 126 democrats that voted opposition will face strong Republican candidates, and that they will make this a central focus of their campaigns.
I expect that many of those 126 democrats are not in "safe" districts. Opportunity time, for Republicans with good political skills.
Same goes for the Senate.
To: Constitution Day
How did David Price vote? And are the anti-war protestors still sitting in his office?
To: kattracks
Hello, I've noticed that all of the candidates in Minnesota's first congressional district support the use of force with Iraq. Only the Republican says so with a little more conviction. It's funny how the Green party guy said he was for it, but thinks war is the easy way out. It's harder to talk about it.
7 posted on
10/11/2002 6:27:40 AM PDT by
discipler
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson