Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: eastsider
he merely demonstrated that the generally accepted geocentric model could be represented mathematically by a system of cycles and epicycles.

Which was accepted as "proof" enough for 1500 years. I was using the word "proof" in the vernacular, and not as a research scientist would use it.

133 posted on 10/11/2002 11:28:20 AM PDT by Skooz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]


To: Skooz
My apologies for sounding critical. I haven't been following this thread, and your post just caught my eye.

As long as I'm here, I'd like to add that the proofs (in the vernacular sense : ) supporting the geocentric model prior to Ptolemy were common-sense notions, such as, "If the earth moved, there would be great winds sweeping everyone off their feet"; "If the earth moved, then when someone jumped up, he would land in a different spot"; etc.

135 posted on 10/11/2002 11:42:45 AM PDT by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson