Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mordoch
OH, so you get to define terrorists. I've always wondered who was going to get to define them for us!

Listen to yourself dude, you sound just like Billy Boy "it all depends what the meaning of "is" is". Which part of the "terrorist" word don't you understand?...are you so narrow minded that you can not comprehend the word "terrorist"?
I suggest for starters to use the on line free "Encyclopedia Britannica" to define the word "terrorist" for you and maybe just maybe you would understand the whole statement if that is not to hard on your intelect(or lack thereof).

64 posted on 10/09/2002 10:34:57 PM PDT by danmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Otto von Bismark
you sound just like Billy Boy "it all depends what the meaning of "is" is".

That was my point exactly. I'm glad someone caught that. Bush can define "is" anyway he wants to. He's just substituting a word.

74 posted on 10/10/2002 4:46:17 PM PDT by Mordoch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson