To: Always Right
Since the powers of the Federal government are narrowly defined in the US Constitution, where in it is the Congress allowed to transfer powers to the Executive branch?
20 posted on
10/09/2002 6:54:28 PM PDT by
Abcdefg
To: Abcdefg
Since the powers of the Federal government are narrowly defined in the US Constitution, where in it is the Congress allowed to transfer powers to the Executive branch? Hey if it's good for NJ and the SCOTUS doesn't rule...well then.... Just kidding
To: Abcdefg
Since the powers of the Federal government are narrowly defined in the US Constitution, where in it is the Congress allowed to transfer powers to the Executive branch?What power did Congress transfer? Surely not the power to declare war. But I'm amenable to convincing. Show me the document that transfers that power to the POTUS.
29 posted on
10/09/2002 7:00:20 PM PDT by
jwalsh07
To: Abcdefg
Since the powers of the Federal government are narrowly defined in the US Constitution, where in it is the Congress allowed to transfer powers to the Executive branch? In reality what they are doing is declaring war. The consent of Congress and the execution by the President is all it takes. The people can exercize their power by throwing out the bums on November 5th, but since the people support the war, that isn't gonna happen. The Checks and Balances are in place, and the system is working. If Iraq doesn't disarm and submit to full inspections there shall be war.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson