The poisons you mentioned are not intended for people to shoot them up in their arms.Irrelevant---people have sought highs from many substances not intended for that purpose.
And as I've said before,people want the strongest stuff they can get their hands on.Dilute it and they will just refine it again.
Utter ignorant rubbish---ALL heroin is sold in diluted ("cut") form and there is NO evidence that ANY user has tried to re-concentrate it. You still haven't done your homework, but are relying on "instinct," "intutition," and "caring"---just like a liberal.
I'm just expessing my opinions and trying to involve common sense in them.
When your "common sense opinions" are in support of restricting freedoms, you are either claiming that someone has the authority to restrict freedom or you are simply babbling. Which is it?
in reality,many people's quality of life would degrade as a result of knowing or being related to or involved with the aftermath.
This is true right now of alcohol and tobacco---and yet despite your professed principles you support their legality.
"Irrelevant---people have sought highs from many substances not intended for that purpose."
The fact that legal narcotics would be intended for human consumption makes my point relevant.Airplane glue is not sold for human consumption.It serves a function other than intoxication and therefore people who abuse it to get high are clearly responsible if they misuse it.If narcotics were sanctioned people should expect these substances to be safe.They are not,so how could they be knowingly sold for human consumption?
"ALL heroin is sold in diluted ("cut") form and there is NO evidence that ANY user has tried to re-concentrate it."
Good point there,but that does not hold true for cocaine.The common refinement of coke into crack lends some creedence to my point.
"When your "common sense opinions" are in support of restricting freedoms, you are either claiming that someone has the authority to restrict freedom or you are simply babbling. Which is it?"
You are confusing rational thinking with end consequences in mind with babble.
"This is true right now of alcohol and tobacco---and yet despite your professed principles you support their legality."
You can't accept that I feel these two legal drugs have different characteristics than narcotics.