Replies

"Well, these reporters who were so johnny-on-the-spot to "discredit" the photos being taken in Davis' then office must be racing all over to determine where the pictures were, in fact, taken."

Another poster said that Grayout had FOUR state offices as Lt. Governor. This ain't over yet, if the story stays alive. Coming up next is the Nathanson letter. That should make for a good read...

Yes, I had read that, too. I think it is interesting that nobody "can recall" exactly where the photo was taken.

It may be that it was not on state property, but I think the dismissive tone the reporters are taking today is not warranted since Davis and Angele have not specified the exact location.

After all, it is not just a question of that one location that the reporters raced to check out. According to the article:

It's a violation of state law to give or receive campaign contributions in state buildings.

The reporters are just accepting Davis' lame answer:

Davis said he wasn't sure but it may have been at a private office where COPS took a picture to use in their newsletter.

What "private office" would that be? Why wouldn't this Angele be able to step up and identify it?