'The most corrupt governor in the United States since Bill Clinton.' (Depending on one's definition of corrupt=pay for play politics, of course)
Posted on 10/09/2002 12:43:30 PM PDT by RCW2001
ERICA WERNER, Associated Press Writer
Wednesday, October 9, 2002
©2002 Associated Press
URL: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2002/10/09/politics1507EDT0690.DTL
(10-09) 12:07 PDT LOS ANGELES (AP) --
Republican candidate Bill Simon on Wednesday conceded that his allegation that Gov. Gray Davis illegally accepted a campaign check inside the state Capitol "is now in question," and Davis called on him to drop out of the governor's race.
Simon still defended himself for making the claim, which was based on now-discredited photographs released by a law enforcement group that is a key Simon ally and a complaint the group made to a state watchdog agency.
"I had no reason to question the California Organization of Police and Sheriffs' good faith belief in their charge against the governor," Simon said in a statement.
"They were reporting the charge directly to the government enforcement agency, and they claimed that they had documented proof of their charge," he said.
Simon made the accusation Monday after the first gubernatorial debate and said he had evidence.
The evidence turned out to be two photos COPS released Tuesday that the group claimed showed then-Lt. Gov. Davis accepting a check in his Capitol office during his first run for governor in 1998. It's a violation of state law to give or receive campaign contributions in state buildings.
Reporters and the Davis campaign determined the photos were not taken in Davis' office.
Simon did not back completely off his allegation.
"The location where the governor received this campaign contribution is now in question," his statement said. "However, even if the specific claims made by the California Organization of Police and Sheriffs are not sustained, this outcome should not deter the Fair Political Practices Commission, other law enforcement agencies and the media from investigating Gray Davis' aggressive and shady fund-raising practices."
Davis, meanwhile, called on Simon to withdraw from the race for making the allegation.
"This whole sorry episode has backfired in Mr. Simon's face ... as a former prosecutor, he should certainly be embarrassed, and if he had any sense of honor, he would drop out of the race," the governor said on KGO-AM. "You have to check your facts in this business."
Davis said his campaign would consider suing COPS.
The photos show Davis standing in an office next to Al Angele, then executive director of COPS. Both men are smiling and holding a corner of a $10,000 check COPS gave Davis.
Monty Holden, current executive director of COPS, which broke bitterly with Davis to back Simon, told reporters Tuesday that Angele and Davis were in the lieutenant governor's office.
However, the office pictured in the photographs bore no resemblance to the lieutenant governor's office. Angele said he'd never set foot in Davis' office, and Davis said he was not even in Sacramento when the photos were purportedly taken.
Simon acknowledged his campaign, which has donated over $200,000 to COPS to appear on its slate mailer, had not sought to verify the authenticity of the photos.
It remained unclear Wednesday where the photos were taken. Davis said he wasn't sure but it may have been at a private office where COPS took a picture to use in their newsletter.
The episode is the latest embarrassment for Simon, a first-time candidate who lags behind Davis in polls and has suffered a series of setbacks, including a civil fraud verdict against his family investment firm that was later thrown out by a judge.
©2002 Associated Press
I've said it before and I'll say it again...
I hope you "RINO" SCREAMING fools are happy with your choice...You've snatched defeat out of the jaws of victory. There is only ONE politician more inept than Gray Davis...Simon.
Enjoy another 4 years of Gray your "RINO" SCREAMERS, you DESERVE HIM!!
No doubt. But what is the story on the liberal COPS endorsement and his paying THEM $200k? There was a story that Davis refused to pay them and they bolted. But this is the first I have seen of Simon paying them.
The one glimmer of hope I have in this whole mess is that Dem voters might act similarly in other states when faced with a less than suitable candidate from their own party.
To: Congressman Billybob
We need a hi-res scan of this photo... I just enlarged it on my desktop. The resolution is too grainy to make out the details of the photo.
Of interest are
1. Date stamp in bottom right labelled 1-31-98
2. Painting over door is unique.
3. Can see outside of door to landscape
4. Who was the photographer? Ask that person where the photo was taken.
5. Obtain records of Gray Davis' day on 1-31-98 and identify venues
6. Enlarge image of check. We can see who signed the check and for how much.
49 posted on 10/8/02 8:38 PM Central by bonesmccoy
AND
To: IVote2
I have looked at a 1500 x 1800 image at 800%. The pixelation to which you refer is on the left side of Davis as well. It might be optical shadowing from a bounce flash. The hair crosses those boundaries intact without unusual fringing. I don't think it's been digitally doctored, particularly because of the scanning patterns that cross the boundaries vertically between the faces and the backdrop. Such noise would be VERY hard to replicate. In short, don't look at the picture for clues (where a fraud artist would work hard to get rid of evidence), look at the total image. I think it's real.
67 posted on 10/8/02 11:45 PM Central by Carry_Okie
Just FYI
Ya THINK? :-)
Kind of obvious....actually, I think more than just Davis.
It may be that it was not on state property, but I think the dismissive tone the reporters are taking today is not warranted since Davis and Angele have not specified the exact location.
After all, it is not just a question of that one location that the reporters raced to check out. According to the article:
It's a violation of state law to give or receive campaign contributions in state buildings.
The reporters are just accepting Davis' lame answer:
Davis said he wasn't sure but it may have been at a private office where COPS took a picture to use in their newsletter.
What "private office" would that be? Why wouldn't this Angele be able to step up and identify it?
The one glimmer of hope I have in this whole mess is that Dem voters might act similarly in other states when faced with a less than suitable candidate from their own party.
Does this mean we can appoint another candidate? Afterall, did the NJSC say we have to have 1 Democrat and 1 Republican on the ballot!
What an idiotic statement for Davis to make!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.