GO SIMON
Tom McClintock for CA State Controller
Posted on 10/09/2002 12:43:30 PM PDT by RCW2001
That's not an effective way to run a campaign especially when you have your own questionable baggage. Politics 101.
Needs saying in big font alright!
Unfortunately he no longer owns the house he says was the site of this event so we shan't be seeing the intrepid reporters gathering en masse to "inspect" the home to verify this claim as they did in the case of the one office.
Oh, if they would always act the part of bloodhound, but evidently only when instructed by the dems do they engage in such field work.
Well, Pete Wilson was a moderate Republican when he first ran for Governor. When he decided to run for the 1996 Presidential nomination, he changed... which was one of his problems.
Put up or shut up, Johnny One-Note.
Well, according to post 133 above, it was a private home.
Still in all, these are democrats. And their lips are moving. So they're probably lying.
The Clinton Legacy strikes again.
But it was a long way to the end! ...I'll go to the corner now!
Oh, no!
I wasn't chastising you!
Any attitude in my reply was due to my disdain for the dems and the media.
I trust you still have some of that disdain reserved for the inept Simon campaign.
Not as much as for the dems/media.
You are right, they should have vetted the picture. If there is something to it (which I don't think has been cleared away), they should have had the facts before aligning themselves with it.
That being said, I do not think it the huge disaster some do. And for Davis to call on Simon to step down is absurd.
#1 on Amazon.com......
How Not To Run a Political Campaign.....by Bill Simon
I voted for him. He was a darn good mayor and a good senator.
People like yourself are the reason the GOP is in such trouble in California. California Republican's have forgotten Reagan's 11th Commandmandent. Because Wilson was progressive on social issues, when he first ran, doesn't mean that he was 'worse' than the Democrat alternative. Kathleen Brown? Who would you rather see run the state?
After all, isn't the supposed core of the GOP a limited government?
Isn't even the most RINO of candidates going to do more to promote a limited government than the most conservative Democrat?
This demonstrates the problem the GOP has in California. Lundgren was wrong; the people are not more conservative than they think. As long as the GOP primary voters continue to elect hard line candidates, they will lose.
Furthermore, Davis has given any Democrat who cares to run the platform to run upon. Davis is so strong on crime that Simon has to give $200k to some tiny organization that pretends to represent cops to get any law enforcement support. Then the organization pulls this latest crap.
Simon can't get to the right of Davis on crime. There isn't any room.
Californian's care about that issue.
Simon can get to the right of Davis on abortion, environmental laws, etc.
To the extent that Californian's care about these issues, getting to the right isn't what they want.
Simon could make some hay on taxes, but so far as I am aware, all he has is platitudes, which Davis, being a consummate politician, can easily defeat.
Simon simply has run one of the worst campaigns in history.
Perhaps the only thing funnier is the earlier post blaming Parsky, who worked hard to get Dick nominated.
If Dick were on the ballot, Davis would be history.
This is what you need to realize, Simon trails by maybe 5 percentage points. This is no time to reconsider. The Dems ride a candidate even if they were caught smoking crack, driving drunk, while molesting a school boy. Grow a pair of balls and keep backing Simon.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.