Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: paul544; Impeach98
It ain't that much greater in terms of photo editing, but I have done machine vision system setup, lighting, and image processing that helps me understand what is happening with digital photography. I don't pass as a legal "expert."

One thing Impeach98 knows, I wouldn't hesitate for a minute to call it a fake if I thought it was one. I think it's genuine and will happily talk to someone at length as to why.
106 posted on 10/08/2002 4:00:16 PM PDT by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]


To: Carry_Okie
I'm on board with thinking it's real. But even if you're uncertain (which technically in today's digital age we can't be 100% certain). Just look at the way the RATs reacted. They show pictures of Gray's office as it is today and say see they aren't the same.

As I stated earlier either Gray or the other guy knows where that photo was taken. It would be easier for them to say see this is the NON-gov't office located at X location. Since they haven't done that AND the photo appears genuine, I think we have our RAT cornered.

107 posted on 10/08/2002 4:04:00 PM PDT by for-q-clinton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson