Skip to comments.
GOTTA SEE THIS - War for Endur.Freedom (Part 2) DOD UPDATE IMAGES ABOUT IRAQ
DOD ^
| 10/9/02
| The Armies of Good against the Axis of Evil
Posted on 10/08/2002 1:13:59 PM PDT by Diogenesis
DOD UPDATE IMAGES ABOUT IRAQ
TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dod; images; iraq; update
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
To: <1/1,000,000th%; 11B3; 2111USMC; 2Jedismom; 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub; A Ruckus of Dogs; AdA$tra; ...
BUMP
To: Diogenesis
Another favorite.
To: Diogenesis
In the background of the Iraq technology,
this is another reason for this just War.
Dead children - guilty under Saddam of playing in Halabja [March 1988].
To: Diogenesis
Jihadists are known for hiding in civilian clothes, hiding in or foraying from civilian enclaves.
One of the arguments against war with Iraq is "show us the evidence", but it's a bit solipsistic since the "evidence" is disguised to not look like "evidence".
Great pics, btw.
5
posted on
10/08/2002 1:23:25 PM PDT
by
lds23
To: jdogbearhunter; da_toolman
Ping!
To: Diogenesis
"Religion of Peace, Inc." Greetings From Halabja!
7
posted on
10/08/2002 1:29:46 PM PDT
by
VOA
To: Diogenesis
Sorry, I see absolutely no difference in the two "Baby Milk" factory pictures, just upside down.
What am I missing???
8
posted on
10/08/2002 1:32:44 PM PDT
by
aShepard
To: Diogenesis
One thing you can trust is they won't tell the truth.
9
posted on
10/08/2002 1:35:18 PM PDT
by
Lady Jag
To: Diogenesis
Good point:
One of the arguments against war with Iraq is "show us the evidence", but it's a bit solipsistic since the "evidence" is disguised to not look like "evidence".
10
posted on
10/08/2002 1:37:57 PM PDT
by
GOPJ
To: Diogenesis
I dont see anything wrong with the two pictures at the baby milk factory. Am I missing something?
To: sciencediet; All
Better table.
UPDATE IMAGES ABOUT IRAQ
To: Diogenesis
Regarding the staged tours slides (see pictures
1 and
2), isn't it interesting how the Compost was the willing accomplise in the media used for the nuclear site.
13
posted on
10/08/2002 2:19:39 PM PDT
by
steveegg
To: steveegg
Since when did I start spelling like the Brits? That should be accomplice.
14
posted on
10/08/2002 2:23:34 PM PDT
by
steveegg
To: Diogenesis
Hmmm. I'm looking hard at the photo of the "baby-milk" factory in the slide presentation with the approximate area supposedly shown in the first photo marked...
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Oct2002/021008-D-6570C-014.jpg
Hmmm...
How clever of Saddam to build an exact replica of the original site only 300 times larger than the original to fool us. What attention to detail. Right down to the tree lines near the site. How did he make those trees grow in the exact same configuration with the out buildings and the facility expanding that much? Amazing!
In all seriousness, I've got the two photos loaded up, I've flipped the original over, and rotated it about 20 degrees, to have a similar orientation. Now I have to admit, I'm not a trained photo analyst, but it's going to be a stretch for anyone to convince me that the circled are in photo 2 represents the approximate area shown in photo 1.
15
posted on
10/08/2002 2:41:18 PM PDT
by
Slainte
To: Diogenesis
Bump
16
posted on
10/08/2002 3:02:07 PM PDT
by
facedown
To: Diogenesis
Excellent work, Diogenesis. I have to go out for a few hours and will comb through #12 better and print some out when I get back.
Part of my issue with weapons inspections is we've been there, done that. A good indicator of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results. We are doing this in front of Saddam and all it does is make Saddam think we're the ones who are nuts! It is time to stop the charades; it is time for Lake America in the Mideast.
17
posted on
10/08/2002 3:17:07 PM PDT
by
Lady Jag
To: aShepard
Did you see slide 13 "WMD Facility & Program Cover Stories"?
File name 021008-D-6570C-013.jpg. Why would a baby milk factor need to be camoflauged?
To: Slainte
I believe the point of the red arrow inserted on the picture should be pointing at the small white building 1/4 inch in the direction of 4:30 to 5:00.
To: Diogenesis
Thanks for the ping Dio - and all of this information. So why the f_ck can't this stuff be put out to the general public by the RNC? President Bush's speech was great, but it needed info like this to show the sheeple WHY we must take Saddam out.
Mark my word, if we don't take him out he will strike at us AGAIN. The next time, the Rats will be all over the President for not acting - and the sheeple will believe them. If the left wins the Presidency in 2004 through their disinformation tricks that they are using, it will be time for the Red Zone to take matters into our own hands. The military will be on our side.
20
posted on
10/08/2002 3:35:07 PM PDT
by
11B3
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson