To: Asmodeus
The bottom line is that Bush doesn't need the resolution. The resolution passed on 9/14/01 and the UN resolutions already in place are sufficient grounds on which to act. Acting without the congress will not cost him any votes, and waiting for the resolution won't gain him any votes. However, waiting will cost American combatants' lives, something that's meaningless to RATs (except for political purposes) but will mean a lot to Bush, who actually has a brain, a conscience and a heart.
To: clintonh8r
Someone needs to email Hannity, O'Reilly and others so they can hound that on tv and radio.
31 posted on
10/08/2002 1:45:36 PM PDT by
hsmomx3
To: clintonh8r
To heck with UN resolutions. The UN has done nothing in 10m years except foster terrorism. Why are we even having to put pressure on the UN to do the right thing. Why is Russia and China and France supporting the likes of Saddam. Money? The UN is nothing but a debating bunch of Hookers.The only one they want to control is the USA.
43 posted on
10/08/2002 3:08:34 PM PDT by
dalebert
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson