Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Asmodeus
The bottom line is that Bush doesn't need the resolution. The resolution passed on 9/14/01 and the UN resolutions already in place are sufficient grounds on which to act. Acting without the congress will not cost him any votes, and waiting for the resolution won't gain him any votes. However, waiting will cost American combatants' lives, something that's meaningless to RATs (except for political purposes) but will mean a lot to Bush, who actually has a brain, a conscience and a heart.
21 posted on 10/08/2002 1:28:21 PM PDT by clintonh8r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: clintonh8r
Someone needs to email Hannity, O'Reilly and others so they can hound that on tv and radio.
31 posted on 10/08/2002 1:45:36 PM PDT by hsmomx3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: clintonh8r
To heck with UN resolutions. The UN has done nothing in 10m years except foster terrorism. Why are we even having to put pressure on the UN to do the right thing. Why is Russia and China and France supporting the likes of Saddam. Money? The UN is nothing but a debating bunch of Hookers.The only one they want to control is the USA.
43 posted on 10/08/2002 3:08:34 PM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson