Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sensation: Cities Found on the Moon!
Pravda ^

Posted on 10/08/2002 12:36:29 PM PDT by Junior

Reasonable activity of an alien civilization showed up unexpectedly close to us. However, we were not psychologically ready for it

We still come across publications trying to find an answer to the following question: Are we alone in the universe? At the same time, the presence of reasoning beings has been detected close to our home, on the Moon. However, this discovery was immediately classified as secret, as it is so incredible that it even might shake the already existing social principles, reports Russia's newspaper Vecherny Volgograd.

Here is an extract from the official press-release: “NASA scientists and engineers participating in exploration of Mars and the Moon reported the results of their discoveries at a briefing at the Washington National Press Club on March 21, 1996. It was announced for the first time that man-made structures and objects have been discovered on the Moon.” The scientists spoke rather cautiously and evasively about these objects, with the exception of an UFO. They always mentioned that the man-made objects are possible, and stated the information was still under study and official results will be published later.

It was mentioned at the briefing as well that the Soviet Union used to own some photo materials proving the presence of such activity on the Moon. And, although it wasn’t identified what kind of activity it was, thousands of photo- and video materials from the Apollos and the Clementine space station showed many parts on the lunar surface where this activity and its traces were perfectly evident. The video films and photos made by US astronauts during the Apollo program were demonstrated at the briefing. People were extremely surprised why the materials hadn’t been presented to the public earlier. NASA specialists answered: “It was difficult to forecast the reaction of people to information that some creatures had been or still are on the Moon. In addition, there were some other reasons to it, which were beyond the control of NASA.”

Specialist for lunar studies Richard Hoagland says that NASA is still trying to alter photo materials before they are published in public catalogues and files. They do some retouching or are partially refocussing them while copying. Some investigators, Hoagland is among them, suppose that an extraterrestrial race had used the Moon as a terminal station during their activity on the Earth. These suggestions are confirmed by the legends and myths of different nations of our planet.

The ruins of lunar cities stretch for many kilometers. Huge domes on massive basements, numerous tunnels, and other constructions cause scientists to reconsider their opinions concerning the Moon. How the Moon appeared and principles of its revolving around the Earth still pose a great problem for scientists.

Some partially destroyed objects on the lunar surface can’t be placed among natural geological formations, as they are of complex organization and geometrical structure. In the upper part of Rima hadley, not far from the place where the Apollo-15 had landed, a construction surrounded by a tall D-shaped wall was discovered. As of now, different artifacts have been discovered in 44 regions. The NASA Goddard Space Flight Center and the Houston Planetary Institute are investigating the regions. Mysterious terrace-shaped excavations of rock have been discovered near the Tiho crater. The concentric hexahedral excavations and the tunnel entry on the terrace side can’t be the results of natural geological processes; instead, they look very much like open cast mines. A transparent dome raised above the crater edge was discovered near the crater Copernicus. The dome is unusual, as it is glows white and blue from the inside. A rather unusual object, which is unusual indeed even for the Moon, was discovered in the upper part of the Factory area. A disk of about 50 meters in diameter stands on a square basement surrounded with walls. In the picture, close to the rhomb, we can also see a dark, round embrasure in the ground, which resembles an entry to an underground caponier. There is a rectangular area between factory and the crater Copernicus, which is 300 meters wide 400 meters long.

Apollo-10 astronauts took a photo (AS10-32-4822) of a one-mile long object called "Castle," which is at the height of 14 kilometers and casts a distinct shadow on the lunar surface. The object seems to consist of several cylindrical units and a large conjunctive unit. The internal porous structure of the Castle is clearly seen in one of the pictures, which gives the impression that some parts of the object are transparent.

As it turned out at the briefing where many NASA scientists were present, when Richard Hoagland had requested originals of the Castle pictures for the second time, no pictures were found at all. They disappeared even from the list of pictures made by the Apollo-10 crew. Only intermediate pictures of the object were found in the archives, which unfortunately don’t depict the internal structure of the object.

When the Apollo-12 crew landed on the lunar surface, they saw that the landing was observed by a half-transparent, pyramidal object. It was hovering just several meters above the lunar surface and shimmered with all the colors of the rainbow against the black sky.

In 1969, when the film about astronauts travelling to the Sea of Storms was demonstrated (the astronauts saw the strange objects once again, which were later called “striped glasses”), NASA finally understood what consequences such kind of control could bring. Astronaut Mitchell answered the question about his feelings after his successful return: “My neck still aches as I had to constantly turn my head around, because we felt we were not alone there. We had no choice but to pray.” Johnston, who worked at the Houston Space Center and studied photos and video materials made during the Apollo program, discussed the artifacts with Richard Hoagland and said that the NASA leadership was awfully annoyed with the great number of anomalous, to put it mildly, objects on the Moon. It was even said that piloted flights to the Moon might be banned.

Investigators are especially interested in ancient structures resembling partially destroyed cities. Photos reveal an astonishingly regular geometry of square and rectangular constructions. They resemble our cities seen from the height of 5-8 kilometers. A mission control specialist commented on the pictures: “Our guys observed ruins of the Lunar cities, transparent pyramids, domes, and God knows what else, which are currently hidden deep inside the NASA safes, and felt like Robinson Crusoe when he suddenly came across prints of bare feet on the sand of the desert island.” What do geologists and scientists say after studying the pictures of lunar cities and other anomalous objects? They say that such objects can’t be natural formations. “We should admit they are artificial, especially the domes and pyramids.” Reasonable activity of an alien civilization showed up unexpectedly close to us. We were not ready for it psychologically, and some people hardly believe they are true even now.

Translated by Maria Gousseva

Read the original in Russian: http://pravda.ru/society/2002/10/04/47957.html

Related links:

PRAVDA.Ru First Indian may step onto Moon in 2005
PRAVDA.Ru Will the first moon base be Chinese?
SPACE.com : NASA Reveals New Plan for the Moon, Mars & Outward
CNN : New moon to leave Earth orbit
Spaceflight Now : Mystery moon around Earth likely Apollo rocket
SPACE.com : Apollo Moon Booster Still Flies as Detailed Model Rocket
CNN : Fallen Challenger, Apollo astronauts remembered
BBC : Apollo samples reveal Moons origin
PRAVDA.Ru Fifty-five years of insanity
PRAVDA.Ru UFO Prevents Blast at Chernobyl Nuclear Plant
Salon : UFOs in the land of the rising sun


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: cydonia; hoagland; mars; moon; pravda; tinfoilhat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-260 last
To: #3Fan
Oh, I most certainly do believe in prophets, but I understand that there are a hundred false prophets for every real one.

And, my handle was a Navy nickname; I'm not a NASCAR fan (Lord, forgive me) -- I rather enjoy a good formula race and the occasional grand prix.

241 posted on 10/10/2002 5:24:14 PM PDT by Junior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
"Do you ever wonder why we no longer go to the Moon, or that no other nation is trying to go there (except China!)?"

Man, that's a hard queston! Lets see, hmmmmm. Maybe it's because it's technologically very difficult to do and it costs lots and lots of money? And perhaps because there's only one country in the world that can do it? Well am I right?

242 posted on 10/10/2002 5:31:25 PM PDT by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: StormEye
I don't know if you're right or not, but you're sure a smartass.
243 posted on 10/10/2002 5:48:20 PM PDT by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: #3Fan
Merely an observation, to the best I recall now. I doubt I was even irrated.
244 posted on 10/10/2002 5:51:19 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
irrated.

Irritated. Ewes spell checquer!

245 posted on 10/10/2002 5:52:12 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: Ready2go
Maybe so, but these weren't MY ancestors. Hope they weren't yours, either.
246 posted on 10/10/2002 5:55:44 PM PDT by Citizen of the Savage Nation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
"I don't know if you're right or not, but you're sure a smartass."

Nothing personal -- just tired of space aliens, cities on the moon, dumbass Art Bell psuedo-scientific claptrap! But I do find Mars interesting.

247 posted on 10/10/2002 6:05:25 PM PDT by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: StormEye
Do you believe there are Angels?... They would be extra-terrestrials if real. I've never seen an angel, that I know of, but I have seen an object at close range that defied our current physics (the object was seen in 1970, but it is still beyond the capabilities of aircraft I would presume we have far advanced from the blackbird).
248 posted on 10/10/2002 6:14:12 PM PDT by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith
Daneel Olivaw lives!

I still only wish!

249 posted on 10/10/2002 6:23:22 PM PDT by higgmeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Junior
Oh, I most certainly do believe in prophets, but I understand that there are a hundred false prophets for every real one.

If those were prophetic pictures of future machines then I'd say they were pretty accurate. What about the ancient delta-wing aircraft trinkets in South America? An engineer built a foot long model of one and it flew perfectly. How do you suppose those came into being?

And, my handle was a Navy nickname; I'm not a NASCAR fan (Lord, forgive me) -- I rather enjoy a good formula race and the occasional grand prix.

No offense but I'm glad you're not an Earnhardt fan. The overwhelming majority of Earnhardt fans I know in person or on the net are open-minded, courteous, and thoughtful. People who dismiss things out of hand without knowing the facts are close-minded. It's why the academic scientific community is so far behind.

250 posted on 10/10/2002 6:39:24 PM PDT by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
Merely an observation, to the best I recall now. I doubt I was even irrated.

I call people ignorant all the time in friendly conversation. /sarcasm

251 posted on 10/10/2002 6:40:46 PM PDT by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: StormEye
Nothing personal -- just tired of space aliens, cities on the moon, dumbass Art Bell psuedo-scientific claptrap! But I do find Mars interesting.

Um dude...the title of this thread should've been a pretty big hint to you that these subjects would be discussed.

252 posted on 10/10/2002 6:43:10 PM PDT by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: #3Fan
OK, a bit of enlightenment. I'd call myself an atheist if I were sure that there is no God. I have met people so convinced and was struck by the difference in attitudes between such and myself. I am not one of them.

I don't see how anyone can claim to know such questions, at least until such a time as real miracles become evident to all. (That is, unless and until God chooses to reveal himself.) I certainly don't know, myself, if there's a spiritual side to the universe, since it would by nature be unobservable anyway.

The distinction between two words may be of no interest to you. However, it is incorrect to say that there is no difference. That's why there are separate words for the separate cases.

253 posted on 10/10/2002 7:08:46 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
OK, a bit of enlightenment. I'd call myself an atheist if I were sure that there is no God. I have met people so convinced and was struck by the difference in attitudes between such and myself. I am not one of them.

You are sure there is no such things as prophetic visions. Most of the bible is composed of prophetic visions. How can you not be an atheist?

I don't see how anyone can claim to know such questions, at least until such a time as real miracles become evident to all.

Bible prophesy comes true all the time. That's how I know.

(That is, unless and until God chooses to reveal himself.) I certainly don't know, myself, if there's a spiritual side to the universe, since it would by nature be unobservable anyway.

Not all the time. Prophesies in the bible come true all the time. That's where the revelations are for people willing to study and look for them.

The distinction between two words may be of no interest to you. However, it is incorrect to say that there is no difference. That's why there are separate words for the separate cases.

I used to be an atheist/agnostic and even when I didn't believe in the bible I did believe in prophetic visions. It's illogical to be sure that prophecy cannot occur but then be kinda/sorta on the bible. Unless maybe you believe that there may be God but the bible isn't His Word. Or maybe you believe in something like Gaia or the "all things are God" deal.

Bottom line is you don't believe in prophecy so we have irreconcilable differences on this issue of ancient carvings and models of modern machinery, not that they must be prophetic visions, they could be machines of a lost civilization. The odds of "corrected" hyroglyphics drawing 4 modern machines within inches of each other and unique in all of Egypt are just too astronomical for me to accept over the two possibilities I put forth.

254 posted on 10/10/2002 7:30:39 PM PDT by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: #3Fan
You're saying basically that it's Biblical Prophecy or atheism. False dichotomy. You've got to get out more.
255 posted on 10/10/2002 7:33:46 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
You're saying basically that it's Biblical Prophecy or atheism.

No, I'm saying that if you're sure that there is no such thing as prophecy, then you must be sure that the bible isn't treue because most of the bible is prophecy.

False dichotomy. You've got to get out more.

I've done more than you I bet.

256 posted on 10/10/2002 7:48:24 PM PDT by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: #3Fan
Is a Hindu an atheist? A Muslim? A polytheist/animist of any one of hundreds of religions world-wide? A non-Christian Deist?

Your insular view leads you to misuse words.
257 posted on 10/10/2002 7:55:25 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
Is a Hindu an atheist? A Muslim? A polytheist/animist of any one of hundreds of religions world-wide? A non-Christian Deist?

Hindus and Muslims believe in prophecy, don't they? Reread my longer post above. I left open the possibility that you could be a Gaia worshipper or something of that sort.

Your insular view leads you to misuse words.

Like I said, reread my longer post above. I said that if you don't believe in the bible, you could be one of those new age worshippers or something of the sort and not be an atheist. Calm down.

258 posted on 10/10/2002 8:00:06 PM PDT by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: #3Fan
Well, I'm not any of those things. I'm an agnostic, so I'm not an atheist. No, I don't accept miracles until I start seeing better evidence for their reality. I'm pretty skeptical of UFOs, ghosts, and the Monkey Man of India for the same reason.

Have a nice night.

259 posted on 10/10/2002 8:04:22 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
Well, I'm not any of those things. I'm an agnostic, so I'm not an atheist. No, I don't accept miracles until I start seeing better evidence for their reality. I'm pretty skeptical of UFOs, ghosts, and the Monkey Man of India for the same reason.

The evidence for miracles is all around us. You don't see them because you don't want to see them.

260 posted on 10/10/2002 8:32:23 PM PDT by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-260 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson