Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kattracks
It would be Pearl Harbor in reverse, because we have publically disclosed what we intend to do, which the Japanese didn't do.
5 posted on 10/07/2002 10:42:26 PM PDT by coloradan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: coloradan
Kennedy is a loser. Put a sock in it Ted!
6 posted on 10/07/2002 10:46:39 PM PDT by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: coloradan
It would be Pearl Harbor in reverse, because we have publically disclosed what we intend to do, which the Japanese didn't do.

Not to mention the fact that there is no moral relationship between what Japan did to us and what we are about to do to Iraq.

19 posted on 10/07/2002 11:36:12 PM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: coloradan
"It would be Pearl Harbor in reverse, because we have publically disclosed what we intend to do, which the Japanese didn't do."

Obviously, Ted's comment is "Demo-speak". In addition to your comment above, Pearl Harbor was a smashing defeat for the US. A "Pearl Harbor in reverse" obviously means that Teddie Chappaquiddic thinks the Iraq campaign will be a smashing victory for the US.

27 posted on 10/08/2002 2:43:07 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson