Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dave S
Where do you get those estimates of risk?

Look at the political alignment of those nay sayers.

They can not point to medical data.

Why?

Because we didn't have 20,000 deaths when this EXACT vaccine was used 25 years ago.

Are we suddenly weaker now than 25 years ago?

Are you weaker now than you were 25 years ago?

Politically and militarily we may be weak.

Physiologically we are no different.
18 posted on 10/08/2002 8:02:32 AM PDT by bonesmccoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: bonesmccoy
Because we didn't have 20,000 deaths when this EXACT vaccine was used 25 years ago.

I didnt say 20,000 deaths, I said 20,000 deaths or severe reactions. Also 25 years ago, we vacinated only children, a small percentage of our entire population. I was vacinated back in the 50's and havent been vacinated again since then. Also the US population is much larger today than it was back in the 50-60's, therefore a percentage of that larger number leads to a larger total number people POTENTIALLY at risk for adverse effects.

My own thought but there are quite a few people who are more at risk from an immune standpoint today than in the 60's. More people with AIDS/HIV, allergies, chronic fatigue syndrome, etc. These people with immune problems are likely to be more at risk, either from direct immunization or close association with someone that was immunized.

I recall the number from several documents I read the other day when I did a search on Google. I believe it also matched up with a similar number from a Wall Street Journal article.

19 posted on 10/08/2002 8:56:06 AM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson